Delhi gang rape case- verdict on juvenile accused stayed

2K Views
0 Replies
1 min read
It has been argued before supreme court that the case like rape should not be decided on basis of age of accused but on his mental capacity or intellect. The apex court has stayed the verdict by juvenile court.

http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/delhi-gangrape-verdict-on-accused-juvenile-of-may-be-put-off-subramanian-swamy/1/297230.html

11 Replies

It has been argued before supreme court that the case like rape should not be decided on basis of age of accused but on his mental capacity or intellect. The apex court has stayed the verdict by juvenile court.

http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/delhi-gangrape-verdict-on-accused-juvenile-of-may-be-put-off-subramanian-swamy/1/297230.html


If a person can commit a henious crime , his age should not stand in the way of justice being meted out to him....Here, his mental capacity and intellect are both warped and thats what should be considered while he is being tried for his crime...
Now apex court has allowed the juvenile court to announce verdict in case of the juvenile offender.

http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/delhi-gangrape-sc-allows-juvenile-board-to-pass-verdict-on-minor-accused/article5048265.ece
It has been argued before supreme court that the case like rape should not be decided on basis of age of accused but on his mental capacity or intellect. The apex court has stayed the verdict by juvenile court.

http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/delhi-gangrape-verdict-on-accused-juvenile-of-may-be-put-off-subramanian-swamy/1/297230.html


If a person can commit a henious crime , his age should not stand in the way of justice being meted out to him....Here, his mental capacity and intellect are both warped and thats what should be considered while he is being tried for his crime...


Thats Correct Usha.. Can't they see the level of crime this guys has commited.. What kind of teen he is.... They shuold be punhished in any way.. No matter whether it comes under juvinile or not. There should be a lesson for all...
It has been argued before supreme court that the case like rape should not be decided on basis of age of accused but on his mental capacity or intellect. The apex court has stayed the verdict by juvenile court.

http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/delhi-gangrape-verdict-on-accused-juvenile-of-may-be-put-off-subramanian-swamy/1/297230.html


If a person can commit a henious crime , his age should not stand in the way of justice being meted out to him....Here, his mental capacity and intellect are both warped and thats what should be considered while he is being tried for his crime...


he is not 10 or 12 year old. His age is more than 17 years. What is difference between 17 and 18 year. A person who age is 17 years and 10 month in innocent for a crime but just after competing 18 year he is faulty for that crime. What happen with in 2 months. It is not fair.
It has been argued before supreme court that the case like rape should not be decided on basis of age of accused but on his mental capacity or intellect. The apex court has stayed the verdict by juvenile court.

http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/delhi-gangrape-verdict-on-accused-juvenile-of-may-be-put-off-subramanian-swamy/1/297230.html


If a person can commit a henious crime , his age should not stand in the way of justice being meted out to him....Here, his mental capacity and intellect are both warped and thats what should be considered while he is being tried for his crime...


he is not 10 or 12 year old. His age is more than 17 years. What is difference between 17 and 18 year. A person who age is 17 years and 10 month in innocent for a crime but just after competing 18 year he is faulty for that crime. What happen with in 2 months. It is not fair.


In two months be eligible to commit crime and matured enough to rape.. shit are our system rules...
It has been argued before supreme court that the case like rape should not be decided on basis of age of accused but on his mental capacity or intellect. The apex court has stayed the verdict by juvenile court.

http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/delhi-gangrape-verdict-on-accused-juvenile-of-may-be-put-off-subramanian-swamy/1/297230.html


If a person can commit a henious crime , his age should not stand in the way of justice being meted out to him....Here, his mental capacity and intellect are both warped and thats what should be considered while he is being tried for his crime...


he is not 10 or 12 year old. His age is more than 17 years. What is difference between 17 and 18 year. A person who age is 17 years and 10 month in innocent for a crime but just after competing 18 year he is faulty for that crime. What happen with in 2 months. It is not fair.


In two months be eligible to commit crime and matured enough to rape.. shit are our system rules...


You have to draw a marginal line everywhere even if the marginal case may bring anomaly. You have to fix some age for education level, marriage, crimes and so on. Similarly, you draw boundary between countries. There you cannot argue that just a KM far, the country will be different. What is there in a mile. I do not know how you can manage anything without drawing some margin or boundary.
It has been argued before supreme court that the case like rape should not be decided on basis of age of accused but on his mental capacity or intellect. The apex court has stayed the verdict by juvenile court.

http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/delhi-gangrape-verdict-on-accused-juvenile-of-may-be-put-off-subramanian-swamy/1/297230.html


If a person can commit a henious crime , his age should not stand in the way of justice being meted out to him....Here, his mental capacity and intellect are both warped and thats what should be considered while he is being tried for his crime...


he is not 10 or 12 year old. His age is more than 17 years. What is difference between 17 and 18 year. A person who age is 17 years and 10 month in innocent for a crime but just after competing 18 year he is faulty for that crime. What happen with in 2 months. It is not fair.


In two months be eligible to commit crime and matured enough to rape.. shit are our system rules...


You have to draw a marginal line everywhere even if the marginal case may bring anomaly. You have to fix some age for education level, marriage, crimes and so on. Similarly, you draw boundary between countries. There you cannot argue that just a KM far, the country will be different. What is there in a mile. I do not know how you can manage anything without drawing some margin or boundary.


Sir boundries are to make and save the system, not to break the system.. People take due advantage of such system and hence they should be punished...
On the question if under 18 should be treated as adults in criminal matters, these youngsters have access to everything adults have. Most of the youngsters do what adults do in terms of sexual and social activities. But when the matter of crime even brutal crime comes they are treated as juvenile. This is a big mistake and should not be acceptable. They deserve the same level of punishment as adults do and should be tried for murder if they have committed murder.
It has been argued before supreme court that the case like rape should not be decided on basis of age of accused but on his mental capacity or intellect. The apex court has stayed the verdict by juvenile court.

http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/delhi-gangrape-verdict-on-accused-juvenile-of-may-be-put-off-subramanian-swamy/1/297230.html


If a person can commit a henious crime , his age should not stand in the way of justice being meted out to him....Here, his mental capacity and intellect are both warped and thats what should be considered while he is being tried for his crime...


Thats Correct Usha.. Can't they see the level of crime this guys has commited.. What kind of teen he is.... They shuold be punhished in any way.. No matter whether it comes under juvinile or not. There should be a lesson for all...


We can see how people are taking advantage of this very law..in the latest gang rape case of Mumbai one of the rapists grand mother says that they will appeal since he is under age...So now we are actually encouraging minors to commit rape and get away...
It has been argued before supreme court that the case like rape should not be decided on basis of age of accused but on his mental capacity or intellect. The apex court has stayed the verdict by juvenile court.

http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/delhi-gangrape-verdict-on-accused-juvenile-of-may-be-put-off-subramanian-swamy/1/297230.html


If a person can commit a henious crime , his age should not stand in the way of justice being meted out to him....Here, his mental capacity and intellect are both warped and thats what should be considered while he is being tried for his crime...


Thats Correct Usha.. Can't they see the level of crime this guys has commited.. What kind of teen he is.... They shuold be punhished in any way.. No matter whether it comes under juvinile or not. There should be a lesson for all...


We can see how people are taking advantage of this very law..in the latest gang rape case of Mumbai one of the rapists grand mother says that they will appeal since he is under age...So now we are actually encouraging minors to commit rape and get away...


apparently, now boys get mature earlier than before. I favor changing the age of juvenile to fifteen years.
It has been argued before supreme court that the case like rape should not be decided on basis of age of accused but on his mental capacity or intellect. The apex court has stayed the verdict by juvenile court.

http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/delhi-gangrape-verdict-on-accused-juvenile-of-may-be-put-off-subramanian-swamy/1/297230.html


If a person can commit a henious crime , his age should not stand in the way of justice being meted out to him....Here, his mental capacity and intellect are both warped and thats what should be considered while he is being tried for his crime...


he is not 10 or 12 year old. His age is more than 17 years. What is difference between 17 and 18 year. A person who age is 17 years and 10 month in innocent for a crime but just after competing 18 year he is faulty for that crime. What happen with in 2 months. It is not fair.


He deserves punishment irrespective of his age. If he can commit rape so savagely, he can withstand punishment as well. He must pay for what he purchased to let others know that you are not going to roam free if you do not behave.

Topic Author

G

gkajmani

@gkajmani

Topic Stats

Created Wednesday, 31 July 2013 08:11
Last Updated Tuesday, 30 November -0001 00:00
Replies 0
Views 2K
Likes 0

Share This Topic