Jump to Forum..
- Boddunan.com Updates
- - Announcements
- - Contests & Rewards
- - Group Discussions
- Discussions
- - General Discussions
- - Improving English Writing Skills
- - Q n A - Find answers to your questions
- - Daily Dose
- - Topics of Interest
- - - Current Affairs & Latest News
- - - Education & Learning
- - - Humor & Jokes
- - - Movies & Entertainment
- Your Vote Counts
- - Feedback
- - Suggestion Box
- Shoutbox
- - Introduce Yourself
- - The Lounge
- - Help
- - Testimonials
Like it on Facebook, Tweet it or share this topic on other bookmarking websites.
12 years ago
It has been argued before supreme court that the case like rape should not be decided on basis of age of accused but on his mental capacity or intellect. The apex court has stayed the verdict by juvenile court.
http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/delhi-gangrape-verdict-on-accused-juvenile-of-may-be-put-off-subramanian-swamy/1/297230.html
If a person can commit a henious crime , his age should not stand in the way of justice being meted out to him....Here, his mental capacity and intellect are both warped and thats what should be considered while he is being tried for his crime...
he is not 10 or 12 year old. His age is more than 17 years. What is difference between 17 and 18 year. A person who age is 17 years and 10 month in innocent for a crime but just after competing 18 year he is faulty for that crime. What happen with in 2 months. It is not fair.
He deserves punishment irrespective of his age. If he can commit rape so savagely, he can withstand punishment as well. He must pay for what he purchased to let others know that you are not going to roam free if you do not behave.
Page 2 of 2
You do not have permissions to reply to this topic.
Related Topics