yes chinmayjee you are right.
always, proofs are asked for truths, not for lies.
You will ask proof for anything that matters to you- truth or lie. There is no need to ask proof for everything- true or false. The image of naked child is likened to naked truth. Animals are also always naked and hence they are true. But human adults wear clothes and so they are false. I am really amused.
G. K. Ajmani Tax consultant http://gkajmani-mystraythoughts.blogspot.com/
yes chinmayjee you are right.
always, proofs are asked for truths, not for lies.
You will ask proof for anything that matters to you- truth or lie. There is no need to ask proof for everything- true or false. The image of naked child is likened to naked truth. Animals are also always naked and hence they are true. But human adults wear clothes and so they are false. I am really amused.
This is exactly the problem you run into when a figurative use is rendered literal what is in logic known as 'fallacy'! It is obvious enough that a lie can not dress! The use of the word 'dress' is expressively figurative. Image of the child is illustrative of the power of truth which a child is capable of!
yes chinmayjee you are right.
always, proofs are asked for truths, not for lies.
Not necessary proofs are asked even for lies. But its better to always speak truth as one has to tell many lies to proof one lie a truth. :blink:
You need generally speak the truth. But truth by itself cannot be objective. Good for mankind is object. a lie for human welfare and national interest is better than pure truth. One may have to conceal truth in discharge of his duties. You may have to tell lie to your country's enemy as a patriotic duty. You cannot be truthful to the cheats and thieves.
G. K. Ajmani Tax consultant http://gkajmani-mystraythoughts.blogspot.com/
