Whose performance is excellent: One year of Narendra Modi or 100 days of Arvind Kejriwal?

 Performances cannot be be evaluated in a given time period. A hitherto  worst performer may spring a surprise with a brilliant piece of performance and a popular person's performance may go down with a single act,

Hence, i suggest to wait and watch a lifetime to evaluate the performances of anybody.

The world is becoming a global village. Earlier politicians ruled for decades. Now everything is being reduced to a few years, months and even days. There r no statesmen or administrators, who think for the welfare of the people, state or the country. now is the age of self-sustaining vultures, who indulge in dirty politics. There is no long term evaluation. Everything is here and now. Although Modi came on a huge mandate, he has used his time to visiting foreign countries. When farmers r dying, he has propagated land usurpation. Whereas Kejriwal has given money to farmers to carry on. an uneducated genocider is pitted against an educated administrator. The result is apparent.

How could you arrive at a definitive conclusion ? Are you sure Midi's foreign trips are going to yield ZERO results? Come up with your views with a definitive basis.

Among many newspaper editorials, I quote The Independent, "Maybe Modi needs to have fewer grandiose trips abroad in the four years he has left before the next election and personally focus on running India in India."

sophia ajaz wrote:

Among many newspaper editorials, I quote The Independent, "Maybe Modi needs to have fewer grandiose trips abroad in the four years he has left before the next election and personally focus on running India in India."

 

Plese provide the weblink so that I can read and comeup with my own views.

http://blogs.independent.co.uk/2015/05/10/modis-first-year-part-2-prime-ministerial-focus-needed/

It is very shortsighted to think that Modi foreign trips are of no use. In fact right from Time magazine to TOI have agreed he brought a whiff of fresh air. In UAE where I am now, first time I heard people talking good of india after Modi came to power.

People in opposition find something wrong in everything however good for the interest of the country. In last 65 years the relations of this country had gone so low that countries like Bangladesh, Shrilanka, Nepal and Pakistan were giving us no respect. Modi is trying his level best to bring this country's lost prestige back to track that past governments never cared for.

MG Singh wrote:

It is very shortsighted to think that Modi foreign trips are of no use. In fact right from Time magazine to TOI have agreed he brought a whiff of fresh air. In UAE where I am now, first time I heard people talking good of india after Modi came to power.

 

Absolutely. He has started a trend. It takes time to see the results. It is of no use to predict the fruits of Modi's foreign tours without seeing the outcome of his tours.

And what Kejriwal has done for Delhi, chaos and subsidizes which has been the trend of ruling for this country for decades now. He will spoil the progress of Delhi as long as he will remain in power. 

First of all there is no way a comparison to be done between cm of UT such as Delhi with PM of India. Foreign trips are not for honeymoon but to enhance perception, which diminished in last decade. Apart fro stay in media AAP has done nothing. In constitution it is clearly written where power is but still the conflict. Indian is emerging, after decade of decadence of rules, it is natural for any government to rise above this and it would take time. The drama upon suicide of farmer of AAP ralley spoke about their work style. Farmer suicides are issues related with states not with center. 

True. There is no place for comparison between Modi and Kejriwal.

There is no point in comparing Modi and Kejriwal as they are both class apart from each other. Let us give some more time to Modi as it is only one year since he came into power. We have given more than 4-5 decades to congress and let them loot and maraud our country freely> What Modi is doing is he is trying to bring back our lost face and esteem. On the contrary, what Kejriwal is doing can only be compared to a spoiled brat who can only throw tantrums and create a scene when things don't work his way.

There is absolutely no comparison between Kejriwal who is a misguided missile and a committed leader like Narendra Modi...As far as UK is concerned, all it takes is one trip by our PM to their country and they will be singing a different tune after that rather than criticising him...The article in the Independent is a blog and the personal views of the writer and not the nations opinion so we need not give it a lot of importance ..

sophia ajaz wrote:

The world is becoming a global village. Earlier politicians ruled for decades. Now everything is being reduced to a few years, months and even days. There r no statesmen or administrators, who think for the welfare of the people, state or the country. now is the age of self-sustaining vultures, who indulge in dirty politics. There is no long term evaluation. Everything is here and now. Although Modi came on a huge mandate, he has used his time to visiting foreign countries. When farmers r dying, he has propagated land usurpation. Whereas Kejriwal has given money to farmers to carry on. an uneducated genocider is pitted against an educated administrator. The result is apparent.

 

Those are very strong views taken by you against Modi - He has been absolved of all charges so calling him especially the Prime Minister of our country a Genocider based on probably what Sonia Gandhi said ( Maut ka Saudagar) shows a complete bias. And as far as his education is concerned he has a masters degree which either Sonia or Rahul or for that matter more than 75% of the MPs can claim to have ..

source - wikipedia 

 In 1978 Modi became an RSS sambhaag pracharak (regional organiser), and received a degree in political science after a distance-education course from Delhi University.^[44][45] Five years later, he received a Master of Arts degree in political science from Gujarat University.^[23][46]

It would be better to compare Kejriwal's performance to a neighboring state like Haryana instead of  with Center.  Comparables should be similare. 

Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:

It would be better to compare Kejriwal's performance to a neighboring state like Haryana instead of  with Center.  Comparables should be similare. 

 

Comparison should be on similar factors. Only then each aspect can be compared and contrasted for arriving at a definitive conclusion.

Kejriwal has nothing to show so far, the subsidies he gave to Delhites even before he was sworn in so that's not an achievement but a burden on exchequer.  

I will stop in one line that "Modi is Modi and he will prove it."

Raghav Chouhan wrote:

I will stop in one line that "Modi is Modi and he will prove it."

 

You are required to compare and contrast. Anyhow you have indirectly expressed your view that Modi is incomparable.