OpenMeans Forum

Welcome, Guest
Recent activity
suni51 replied to the topic Hindus dip to below 80% of the population...
One of the same things, this data was released in the name of socio-economics. The actual purpose was to show the economical position of various communities esp the Muslims for providing them reservation and other benefits based on that.
10 years ago
usha manohar replied to the topic Hindus dip to below 80% of the population...
rambabu wrote:
usha manohar wrote:
Either way when there has been a census the results should be brought to the notice of the public which the UPA did not do and NDA is doing and this is 4 years old and by now the figures would have changed. Can you please give the link where Arun Jaiteley made that statement ..
That was in TOI. But exact link I wil givel you in a while.
I have a feeling you have confused it with the socio - economic data .. I give the link here
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Census-2011-data-released-10-key-highlights/articleshow/47923276.cms
10 years ago
suni51 replied to the topic Hindus dip to below 80% of the population...
Anyone interested in Jaitly's statement can check it here
http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/centre-releases-caste-census-highlights-777774
10 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic Hindus dip to below 80% of the population...
usha manohar wrote:
Either way when there has been a census the results should be brought to the notice of the public which the UPA did not do and NDA is doing and this is 4 years old and by now the figures would have changed. Can you please give the link where Arun Jaiteley made that statement ..
That was in TOI. But exact link I will you in a while.
10 years ago
usha manohar replied to the topic Hindus dip to below 80% of the population...
Either way when there has been a census the results should be brought to the notice of the public which the UPA did not do and NDA is doing and this is 4 years old and by now the figures would have changed. Can you please give the link where Arun Jaiteley made that statement ..
10 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic Hindus dip to below 80% of the population...
These are the figures of census of 2011. I was wondering if these old figures are brought to the fore to expose NDA or the reverse by NDA to expose UPA. Arun Jatley's comment in the news created confusion in me. That's why i expressed my doubt.
10 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic Praising your kids..
Praise should make the child to fortify his self confidence and to build his inner strengths. Praise should nit be taken as a bribe offered by the parents.
10 years ago
usha manohar replied to the topic Praising your kids..
epraneeth77 wrote:
Praising should be done so as to make the person feel acknowledge for his efforts & not to make him feel that he has performed exceedingly well. At each stage there is a different challenge & if a person overcomes it he should be praised economically & a pat on the back is sufficient. A good vision & direction are critical to any Individual, if that is present then no amount of praise can make him lose his track.
Good Vision & Direction - Examples Swami Vivekananda. Great Souls are undeterred by external praises & go on to work on the means like Sachin Tendulkar with his practice, passion, Dignity & Humility.
True, what is needed is encouragement more than anything rather than praise bordering on flattery which never helps..We need to make sure that youngsters do not lose their direction and become too full of their own self to the extent that they start looking down on others and become arrogant . Once such an attitude sets in it kills any scope for self improvement !
10 years ago
usha manohar replied to the topic Hindus dip to below 80% of the population...
How so ? I wonder !!! but they probably have their own calculations because some of them are beyond us anyway...
10 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic Praising your kids..
Praneeth, it would be highly appreciated if you express your views How this article according to you is Wonderful
10 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic What qualifies as luxury? And no, it isn't about money.
And the important point participation on forums opens flood gates to knowledge, a luxury that costs nothing.
10 years ago
epraneeth77 added the topic to his favorites: What qualifies as luxury? And no, it isn't about money.
Definition of Luxury is quite hard to define. For some Luxury as always associated with Money. But there are Luxuries which are not related to Money.
http://www.hindustantimes.com/chunk-ht-ui-brunch-columns/what-qualifies-as-luxury/article1-1382630.aspx
10 years ago
epraneeth77 replied to the topic Our great God men!.
Truly, how is that only Hindu's are on the list. A very Important point to note & to reflect upon.
10 years ago
epraneeth77 replied to the topic What qualifies as luxury? And no, it isn't about money.
Truly, being able to participate in these quality forum topic's & conversations is a luxury. In this thread alone we have had diverse & extensive views of what luxuries are. Wonderful & Insightful thread.
10 years ago
epraneeth77 liked a reply to the topic What qualifies as luxury? And no, it isn't about money.
10 years ago
epraneeth77 replied to the topic What qualifies as luxury? And no, it isn't about money.
I enjoy all the luxuries mentioned. I will strive to use it as effectively as humanly possible.
10 years ago
epraneeth77 liked a reply to the topic What qualifies as luxury? And no, it isn't about money.
10 years ago
suni51 replied to the topic Hindus dip to below 80% of the population...
One of the same things, this data was released in the name of socio-economics. The actual purpose was to show the economical position of various communities esp the Muslims for providing them reservation and other benefits based on that.
10 years ago
usha manohar replied to the topic Hindus dip to below 80% of the population...
rambabu wrote:
usha manohar wrote:
Either way when there has been a census the results should be brought to the notice of the public which the UPA did not do and NDA is doing and this is 4 years old and by now the figures would have changed. Can you please give the link where Arun Jaiteley made that statement ..
That was in TOI. But exact link I wil givel you in a while.
I have a feeling you have confused it with the socio - economic data .. I give the link here
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Census-2011-data-released-10-key-highlights/articleshow/47923276.cms
10 years ago
suni51 replied to the topic Hindus dip to below 80% of the population...
Anyone interested in Jaitly's statement can check it here
http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/centre-releases-caste-census-highlights-777774
10 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic Hindus dip to below 80% of the population...
usha manohar wrote:
Either way when there has been a census the results should be brought to the notice of the public which the UPA did not do and NDA is doing and this is 4 years old and by now the figures would have changed. Can you please give the link where Arun Jaiteley made that statement ..
That was in TOI. But exact link I will you in a while.
10 years ago
usha manohar replied to the topic Hindus dip to below 80% of the population...
Either way when there has been a census the results should be brought to the notice of the public which the UPA did not do and NDA is doing and this is 4 years old and by now the figures would have changed. Can you please give the link where Arun Jaiteley made that statement ..
10 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic Hindus dip to below 80% of the population...
These are the figures of census of 2011. I was wondering if these old figures are brought to the fore to expose NDA or the reverse by NDA to expose UPA. Arun Jatley's comment in the news created confusion in me. That's why i expressed my doubt.
10 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic Praising your kids..
Praise should make the child to fortify his self confidence and to build his inner strengths. Praise should nit be taken as a bribe offered by the parents.
10 years ago
usha manohar replied to the topic Praising your kids..
epraneeth77 wrote:
Praising should be done so as to make the person feel acknowledge for his efforts & not to make him feel that he has performed exceedingly well. At each stage there is a different challenge & if a person overcomes it he should be praised economically & a pat on the back is sufficient. A good vision & direction are critical to any Individual, if that is present then no amount of praise can make him lose his track.
Good Vision & Direction - Examples Swami Vivekananda. Great Souls are undeterred by external praises & go on to work on the means like Sachin Tendulkar with his practice, passion, Dignity & Humility.
True, what is needed is encouragement more than anything rather than praise bordering on flattery which never helps..We need to make sure that youngsters do not lose their direction and become too full of their own self to the extent that they start looking down on others and become arrogant . Once such an attitude sets in it kills any scope for self improvement !
10 years ago
usha manohar replied to the topic Hindus dip to below 80% of the population...
How so ? I wonder !!! but they probably have their own calculations because some of them are beyond us anyway...
10 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic Praising your kids..
Praneeth, it would be highly appreciated if you express your views How this article according to you is Wonderful
10 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic What qualifies as luxury? And no, it isn't about money.
And the important point participation on forums opens flood gates to knowledge, a luxury that costs nothing.
10 years ago
epraneeth77 added the topic to his favorites: What qualifies as luxury? And no, it isn't about money.
Definition of Luxury is quite hard to define. For some Luxury as always associated with Money. But there are Luxuries which are not related to Money.
http://www.hindustantimes.com/chunk-ht-ui-brunch-columns/what-qualifies-as-luxury/article1-1382630.aspx
10 years ago
epraneeth77 replied to the topic Our great God men!.
Truly, how is that only Hindu's are on the list. A very Important point to note & to reflect upon.
10 years ago
epraneeth77 replied to the topic What qualifies as luxury? And no, it isn't about money.
Truly, being able to participate in these quality forum topic's & conversations is a luxury. In this thread alone we have had diverse & extensive views of what luxuries are. Wonderful & Insightful thread.
10 years ago
epraneeth77 liked a reply to the topic What qualifies as luxury? And no, it isn't about money.
10 years ago
epraneeth77 replied to the topic What qualifies as luxury? And no, it isn't about money.
I enjoy all the luxuries mentioned. I will strive to use it as effectively as humanly possible.
10 years ago
epraneeth77 liked a reply to the topic What qualifies as luxury? And no, it isn't about money.
10 years ago