OpenMeans Forum
Welcome, Guest
Recent activity
MG Singh created new topic Introduction of Flogging as a punishment for some offences where a simple jail term has no meaning.
Flogging as a punishment exists in the Army act 1950 in India. It is part of the statute of punishments in many countries like Singapore and China. Most Islamic nations have flogging ( whipping) with a lash. This punishment has been seen to have a salutary effect and offences like sedition, insulting national flag etc can be put under this. I wonder if it should be introduced in India. In my view the students who held a meeting for Afzal Guru is a fit case for such a punishment.
10 years ago
Members should practice civilty in discussion..If a member points out from hstory the defeat of Hindus as a analogy, there is no need to take offence. This is a fact. Sadly so many armchair specialists are in this discussion who feel what they say is gospel truth.
10 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic Anti India slogan in JNU, Delhi.
I sincerely feel, in a discussion forum, the question of losing temper by the members is unhealthy. If a member comes up with a convincing response related to the Thread, one has to be broadminded and accept the other member's response.Only undesirable fact is, no member should force his opinion.
10 years ago
MG Singh replied to the topic Anti India slogan in JNU, Delhi.
A point that so called champions of 'truth' fail to realize that a nation is not built on tolerance. In Pakistan a young man has been sentenced to 10 years in jail for flying the Indian flag. ( he was a fan of Kohli). Nation cannot be built on tolerance. This earlier caused the defeat of Hindus. All the culprits need to be arrested and sent to jail. I would advocate flogging like in Singapore. I was in Singapore when an Indian was flogged on orders of court for a trivial offence.
10 years ago
MG Singh replied to the topic Anti India slogan in JNU, Delhi.
Members should practice civilty in discussion..If a member points out from hstory the defeat of Hindus as a analogy, there is no need to take offence. This is a fact. Sadly so many armchair specialists are in this discussion who feel what they say is gospel truth.
10 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic Farmer's suicide- Is this fashion!.
anil wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
anil wrote:
rambabu wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
anil wrote:
usha manohar wrote:
The maximum number of suicide cases are in Karnataka and the CM Siddaramaiah had made some such similar statement , even more insensitive , saying committing suicide had become a habit with farmers in villages and reporting it with relish was a fashion with the media, he had even questioned the media asking them, dont you have anything better to write about, \....No discussion was started about that news was here but of course BJP is news ...Although I am totally against what the BJP minister said about the suicide , it is very insensitive !
Suicide is not solution of problem. I don't know why they are doing. In my state case of farmers suicide is not like other states. Suicide is not habit of farmers but rubbish statements is habit of leaders.
Truly, suicide is not a solution but the poor farmers usually are left with nothing else. The burden of debt is pathetic which frustrates them and they choose the path of suicide.
Respective state governments are expected to sell the farmers Seeds at a subsidized price. But sadly, many governments are selling away the seeds to black marketeers so that the respective MLA pockets the commission. Under such conditions, the farmers are forced to go for loans which, he cannot repay.
Last year agriculture minister of Punjab also pocket commission and duplicate pesticides supplied by manufactures. Crops of cotton destroyed with it. Resultant some farmers commit suicide. Farmers must be think for other means of income like polutry, dairy, and also another crops than traditional.
@anil Lack of education is one very important point which never allows the farmers to think beyond agriculture. There are options like poultry and many more but the farmers fail to take the advantage of it only because they do not have a sound educational and financial background.
You are right but in my area situation is differ. Farmers are much aware about education, Here farmers are doing new experiments in farming. They are also aware for size of their family. today I read one farmer, who was doing business in Canda come back to India and start organic farming. He is using pesticide which is made with cow urine and some local plants.
I agree with you. Subhas Palekar of Maharashtra started a type of Farming, known as 'Natural Farming' or Zero Budget farming doesn't need Chemicals or tractors. Natural fertilizers made out of cow dung and urine are used. The results are fantastic. Such farming is the only panacea in these conditions. The question of Farmer suicides will never arise.
10 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic Cwar may erupt with higher castes also asking for reservations.
MG Singh wrote:
rambabu wrote:
Now, what's happening in HaryanA where The Jat community is agitating for reservations. And this Reservation fever is spreading to other parts of the country. This situation is unwelcome. It goes without saying, the country is breaking in to small states. This in turn is a hazard that leads to weakening of this country. This situation will be used by our enemies. Country cannot develop. In a nutshell it all tantamount to Civil war. We will be fighting with each other.
You are right. India is heading in wrong direction and in years to come it will be worse. I blame Dr. Ambedkar who incorporated this retrograde step of reservation in the constitution. I don't know what will happen but surgery by Army rule will be a help and the President must act. History will damn him otherwise.
Without digging the past or wasting time who is responsible for reservations, it's wise to take care of the present, which is pointing towards Civil war. Unless, this threatening situation is handled, India's future is endangered.
10 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic why men imagine women are attracted to them .
MG Singh wrote:
rambabu wrote:
Jincy Aby wrote:
usha manohar wrote:
Jincy Aby wrote:
The body structure of women always attract men towards her. God creates people as male and female for attracting each other. It is a natural phenomenon. Nothing wrong in that. But do not misuse this opportunity. Men have the tendency to misuse women if circumstances are fit for them because sexual feelings in men are higher than women. Women always should be careful in their dressings.
What exactly does careful mean ? Dis all the rapists who raped toddlers and babies d so because they were not dressed " Carefully' ? I think it is precisely this mindset and attitude by both women and men , especially women that breeds such an attitude among men !
I never say that all reasons behind rape is indecent dressing style of ladies. But this is one of the major reasons behind rape. Men with very poor personality always have the tendency to rape toddlers and babies also even if they are well dressed. They exploit ladies and babies because of their personality disorder.
Whether you agree or disagree, this is a fact that the ladies who expose sensitive parts of their body make men to be sexually attracted to them. We can avoid much of rape, if ladies can give little care while dressing.
Its a misconception to think that, if women are dressed covering the entire body, many atrocities on women can be reduced. Sex maniacs do not spare even the older women even a school going kid. Dressing may be one of the reasons for crimes like rapes. But not the only reason.
I wonder if people who talk of dress as a enticement of rape have studied the psychology of man. Many psychologists have opined a man will rape irrespective of dress. I will dismiss such comments out of hand. The most revealing dresses are worn in Denmark, where I have been and next to my cousins house, girls used to sunbathe in nude, but no rape. How silly can some Indian men get !!!!
You are right, Women, despite wearing a dress that covers her body are safe ?. For sex maniacs, dress will not be a hindrance to commit rape.
10 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic Lowest cost smartphone at just Rs. 251..
anil wrote:
rambabu wrote:
anil wrote:
rambabu wrote:
Babu saroj wrote:
rambabu wrote:
Now the product is in the market. Test for yourself.
Sir have you seen . do you test it yourself.
Why do you bother about others. You are going to use it and you will check. I have a Smartphone already. I don't need another. Check from your Dealer.
If it available in market before closing of booking, than what is need of advance booking.
Compared to the Bookings, the Smartphones supplied in the first phase are very less. In phase wise, the remaining phones will be supplied. That's why the bookings stopped.
According to latest news, Mohit Goel confirmed that Smartphone Freedom 251 will be supplied by all means. Goel further added that on Feb 18, Ringing bells registered 7 crores Registrations. In the first phase only 25 lakh registration are approved. The income received from the online buyers will be kept in a separate account and the organization collects that income only after the delivery of Freedom 251.
He added on every phone the organization earns a profit of Rs. 31
They approve only 25 lakh registration, what happen of others.
Every person who registered online will get the Smartphone in phases. The response was overwhelming, which the Ringing bells did not expect.
10 years ago
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
rambabu wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
rambabu wrote:
anil wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
anil wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
The whole incident reminds me of the bollywood movie Maachis where an innocent youth was picked up by the police. It actually happens and for the police the soft target is the innocent young minds and ultimately their lives get thrashed. If we go by the media report then we are now very sure about one fact that the JNU student's union President got falsely implicated. This is not a fair handling of a situation.
Now this case is in court, SC refused for bail of president of JNU. It is job of court declare some one innocent or guilty. What you write here may be right but why president called meeting in university campus without permission of Adm.
SC did not refuse the bail but it said that he must file the bail petition in HC first and that's why it did not hear the case. I know it is in the court but, do you think we should not have any voice about any case which is in court? We can easily discuss issues among ourselves. Next is if anyone called a meeting without permission means he/she is anti-nationalists, isn't it too much?
Don't forgot agenda of meeting. Afzal guru! It is opinion that one should not be allowed to favor a person who is punished by court.
The very purpose of the meeting was to protest against the hanging of Afzal Guru.
He is not yet punished by the court so I think everyone has the right to opine. Secondly, you must not forget that even The Delhi Police Commissioner has stated that if the accused student make a bail plea then the police department will not oppose it. I think this whole episode is quite deep rooted so we from outside should not judge on the basis of what we are made to see. I always feel that we come up with judgement very easily when the accused is not our own but that's not fair when we know that in many ways students do get trapped. So, let's pray that if the accused is really responsible for all kind of negative protests then he should not be spared but if otherwise then his life should not be shunted as it is being done now.
I'm amazed seeing those who still think that innocents are framed by the Administration of the university and the central Government. What happened in JNU and aftermath is a clear cut case of Treason.
Culprits must be punished.
Don't assume and come to a conclusion. None in this thread has accused the administration of JNU and the Central Government. For God's sake don't try to cut everyone's opinion because all are free to opine. You are free to speak your mind but don't comment accusingly.
Reading your comments reminds me of old times when Hindus always justified all illogical things. So sad and one can see how even now the Hindus will lose. The reason is clear.
10 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic Anti India slogan in JNU, Delhi.
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
MG Singh wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
rambabu wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
rambabu wrote:
anil wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
anil wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
The whole incident reminds me of the bollywood movie Maachis where an innocent youth was picked up by the police. It actually happens and for the police the soft target is the innocent young minds and ultimately their lives get thrashed. If we go by the media report then we are now very sure about one fact that the JNU student's union President got falsely implicated. This is not a fair handling of a situation.
Now this case is in court, SC refused for bail of president of JNU. It is job of court declare some one innocent or guilty. What you write here may be right but why president called meeting in university campus without permission of Adm.
SC did not refuse the bail but it said that he must file the bail petition in HC first and that's why it did not hear the case. I know it is in the court but, do you think we should not have any voice about any case which is in court? We can easily discuss issues among ourselves. Next is if anyone called a meeting without permission means he/she is anti-nationalists, isn't it too much?
Don't forgot agenda of meeting. Afzal guru! It is opinion that one should not be allowed to favor a person who is punished by court.
The very purpose of the meeting was to protest against the hanging of Afzal Guru.
He is not yet punished by the court so I think everyone has the right to opine. Secondly, you must not forget that even The Delhi Police Commissioner has stated that if the accused student make a bail plea then the police department will not oppose it. I think this whole episode is quite deep rooted so we from outside should not judge on the basis of what we are made to see. I always feel that we come up with judgement very easily when the accused is not our own but that's not fair when we know that in many ways students do get trapped. So, let's pray that if the accused is really responsible for all kind of negative protests then he should not be spared but if otherwise then his life should not be shunted as it is being done now.
I'm amazed seeing those who still think that innocents are framed by the Administration of the university and the central Government. What happened in JNU and aftermath is a clear cut case of Treason.
Culprits must be punished.
Don't assume and come to a conclusion. None in this thread has accused the administration of JNU and the Central Government. For God's sake don't try to cut everyone's opinion because all are free to opine. You are free to speak your mind but don't comment accusingly.
Reading your comments reminds me of old times when Hindus always justified all illogical things. So sad and one can see how even now the Hindus will lose. The reason is clear.
I am not here to justify your thinking so it's up to you to reach to a conclusion.
Members are free to express their respective opinions on this platform.
10 years ago
Shampa Sadhya replied to the topic A Letter of Divorce Threat is a Cruelty .
usha manohar wrote:
Written by Shampa Sadhya
What's your opinion regarding the judgement given by the High Court in the case? Link is given below:
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Wifes-letter-talking-of-divorce-remarriage-an-act-of-cruelty-HC/articleshow/51084192.cms
I truly support the judgement. Blackmailing of any kind should not be permitted.
As expected some Indian men would clap their hands at the judgment but an extremely unfair and immature judgment in my opinion, where the wife's feelings have not been taken into account but one single letter written by her probably out of frustration due to loneliness, has been taken as evidence. No mention whether the husband tried to rectify the situation, which is what a husband would do if he wants to set things right instead of keeping the letter for so many years and making an issue ! I feel the wife should be happy at the decision given by the court rather than challenging it because the fellow is simply not worth the trouble !
Being a woman still I support the decision. It is true that among a couple sometimes such conversations do take place but the article pinpoints that the lady got years in between to clarify this doubt but she did not do it. If the man had done so then I would have opined against that man. Among couples blackmailing should not make an inroad.
10 years ago
Shampa Sadhya replied to the topic A lovely gift from a sweet friend.....
Kalyani Nandurkar wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
@Kalyani Nandurkar Well, I don't know who this friend of yours is but I must say that she chose a beautiful gift for you. It's really a wonderful gift.
Thanks you Shampa, It is from Swetha Shenoy, one of the oldest members of boddunan, right from the days when boddunan was started, but she does not come in much due to time constraints.
It seems I have never come across any post of hers. Well, let me take the privilege to wish you: Belated Happy Birthday! Be happy and prosper always.
10 years ago
Shampa Sadhya replied to the topic Anti India slogan in JNU, Delhi.
MG Singh wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
rambabu wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
rambabu wrote:
anil wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
anil wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
The whole incident reminds me of the bollywood movie Maachis where an innocent youth was picked up by the police. It actually happens and for the police the soft target is the innocent young minds and ultimately their lives get thrashed. If we go by the media report then we are now very sure about one fact that the JNU student's union President got falsely implicated. This is not a fair handling of a situation.
Now this case is in court, SC refused for bail of president of JNU. It is job of court declare some one innocent or guilty. What you write here may be right but why president called meeting in university campus without permission of Adm.
SC did not refuse the bail but it said that he must file the bail petition in HC first and that's why it did not hear the case. I know it is in the court but, do you think we should not have any voice about any case which is in court? We can easily discuss issues among ourselves. Next is if anyone called a meeting without permission means he/she is anti-nationalists, isn't it too much?
Don't forgot agenda of meeting. Afzal guru! It is opinion that one should not be allowed to favor a person who is punished by court.
The very purpose of the meeting was to protest against the hanging of Afzal Guru.
He is not yet punished by the court so I think everyone has the right to opine. Secondly, you must not forget that even The Delhi Police Commissioner has stated that if the accused student make a bail plea then the police department will not oppose it. I think this whole episode is quite deep rooted so we from outside should not judge on the basis of what we are made to see. I always feel that we come up with judgement very easily when the accused is not our own but that's not fair when we know that in many ways students do get trapped. So, let's pray that if the accused is really responsible for all kind of negative protests then he should not be spared but if otherwise then his life should not be shunted as it is being done now.
I'm amazed seeing those who still think that innocents are framed by the Administration of the university and the central Government. What happened in JNU and aftermath is a clear cut case of Treason.
Culprits must be punished.
Don't assume and come to a conclusion. None in this thread has accused the administration of JNU and the Central Government. For God's sake don't try to cut everyone's opinion because all are free to opine. You are free to speak your mind but don't comment accusingly.
Reading your comments reminds me of old times when Hindus always justified all illogical things. So sad and one can see how even now the Hindus will lose. The reason is clear.
I am not here to justify your thinking so it's up to you to reach to a conclusion.
10 years ago
MG Singh replied to the topic Anti India slogan in JNU, Delhi.
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
rambabu wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
rambabu wrote:
anil wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
anil wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
The whole incident reminds me of the bollywood movie Maachis where an innocent youth was picked up by the police. It actually happens and for the police the soft target is the innocent young minds and ultimately their lives get thrashed. If we go by the media report then we are now very sure about one fact that the JNU student's union President got falsely implicated. This is not a fair handling of a situation.
Now this case is in court, SC refused for bail of president of JNU. It is job of court declare some one innocent or guilty. What you write here may be right but why president called meeting in university campus without permission of Adm.
SC did not refuse the bail but it said that he must file the bail petition in HC first and that's why it did not hear the case. I know it is in the court but, do you think we should not have any voice about any case which is in court? We can easily discuss issues among ourselves. Next is if anyone called a meeting without permission means he/she is anti-nationalists, isn't it too much?
Don't forgot agenda of meeting. Afzal guru! It is opinion that one should not be allowed to favor a person who is punished by court.
The very purpose of the meeting was to protest against the hanging of Afzal Guru.
He is not yet punished by the court so I think everyone has the right to opine. Secondly, you must not forget that even The Delhi Police Commissioner has stated that if the accused student make a bail plea then the police department will not oppose it. I think this whole episode is quite deep rooted so we from outside should not judge on the basis of what we are made to see. I always feel that we come up with judgement very easily when the accused is not our own but that's not fair when we know that in many ways students do get trapped. So, let's pray that if the accused is really responsible for all kind of negative protests then he should not be spared but if otherwise then his life should not be shunted as it is being done now.
I'm amazed seeing those who still think that innocents are framed by the Administration of the university and the central Government. What happened in JNU and aftermath is a clear cut case of Treason.
Culprits must be punished.
Don't assume and come to a conclusion. None in this thread has accused the administration of JNU and the Central Government. For God's sake don't try to cut everyone's opinion because all are free to opine. You are free to speak your mind but don't comment accusingly.
Reading your comments reminds me of old times when Hindus always justified all illogical things. So sad and one can see how even now the Hindus will lose. The reason is clear.
10 years ago
anil replied to the topic Lowest cost smartphone at just Rs. 251..
rambabu wrote:
anil wrote:
rambabu wrote:
Babu saroj wrote:
rambabu wrote:
Now the product is in the market. Test for yourself.
Sir have you seen . do you test it yourself.
Why do you bother about others. You are going to use it and you will check. I have a Smartphone already. I don't need another. Check from your Dealer.
If it available in market before closing of booking, than what is need of advance booking.
Compared to the Bookings, the Smartphones supplied in the first phase are very less. In phase wise, the remaining phones will be supplied. That's why the bookings stopped.
According to latest news, Mohit Goel confirmed that Smartphone Freedom 251 will be supplied by all means. Goel further added that on Feb 18, Ringing bells registered 7 crores Registrations. In the first phase only 25 lakh registration are approved. The income received from the online buyers will be kept in a separate account and the organization collects that income only after the delivery of Freedom 251.
He added on every phone the organization earns a profit of Rs. 31
They approve only 25 lakh registration, what happen of others.
10 years ago
MG Singh created new topic Introduction of Flogging as a punishment for some offences where a simple jail term has no meaning.
Flogging as a punishment exists in the Army act 1950 in India. It is part of the statute of punishments in many countries like Singapore and China. Most Islamic nations have flogging ( whipping) with a lash. This punishment has been seen to have a salutary effect and offences like sedition, insulting national flag etc can be put under this. I wonder if it should be introduced in India. In my view the students who held a meeting for Afzal Guru is a fit case for such a punishment.
10 years ago
Members should practice civilty in discussion..If a member points out from hstory the defeat of Hindus as a analogy, there is no need to take offence. This is a fact. Sadly so many armchair specialists are in this discussion who feel what they say is gospel truth.
10 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic Anti India slogan in JNU, Delhi.
I sincerely feel, in a discussion forum, the question of losing temper by the members is unhealthy. If a member comes up with a convincing response related to the Thread, one has to be broadminded and accept the other member's response.Only undesirable fact is, no member should force his opinion.
10 years ago
MG Singh replied to the topic Anti India slogan in JNU, Delhi.
A point that so called champions of 'truth' fail to realize that a nation is not built on tolerance. In Pakistan a young man has been sentenced to 10 years in jail for flying the Indian flag. ( he was a fan of Kohli). Nation cannot be built on tolerance. This earlier caused the defeat of Hindus. All the culprits need to be arrested and sent to jail. I would advocate flogging like in Singapore. I was in Singapore when an Indian was flogged on orders of court for a trivial offence.
10 years ago
MG Singh replied to the topic Anti India slogan in JNU, Delhi.
Members should practice civilty in discussion..If a member points out from hstory the defeat of Hindus as a analogy, there is no need to take offence. This is a fact. Sadly so many armchair specialists are in this discussion who feel what they say is gospel truth.
10 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic Farmer's suicide- Is this fashion!.
anil wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
anil wrote:
rambabu wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
anil wrote:
usha manohar wrote:
The maximum number of suicide cases are in Karnataka and the CM Siddaramaiah had made some such similar statement , even more insensitive , saying committing suicide had become a habit with farmers in villages and reporting it with relish was a fashion with the media, he had even questioned the media asking them, dont you have anything better to write about, \....No discussion was started about that news was here but of course BJP is news ...Although I am totally against what the BJP minister said about the suicide , it is very insensitive !
Suicide is not solution of problem. I don't know why they are doing. In my state case of farmers suicide is not like other states. Suicide is not habit of farmers but rubbish statements is habit of leaders.
Truly, suicide is not a solution but the poor farmers usually are left with nothing else. The burden of debt is pathetic which frustrates them and they choose the path of suicide.
Respective state governments are expected to sell the farmers Seeds at a subsidized price. But sadly, many governments are selling away the seeds to black marketeers so that the respective MLA pockets the commission. Under such conditions, the farmers are forced to go for loans which, he cannot repay.
Last year agriculture minister of Punjab also pocket commission and duplicate pesticides supplied by manufactures. Crops of cotton destroyed with it. Resultant some farmers commit suicide. Farmers must be think for other means of income like polutry, dairy, and also another crops than traditional.
@anil Lack of education is one very important point which never allows the farmers to think beyond agriculture. There are options like poultry and many more but the farmers fail to take the advantage of it only because they do not have a sound educational and financial background.
You are right but in my area situation is differ. Farmers are much aware about education, Here farmers are doing new experiments in farming. They are also aware for size of their family. today I read one farmer, who was doing business in Canda come back to India and start organic farming. He is using pesticide which is made with cow urine and some local plants.
I agree with you. Subhas Palekar of Maharashtra started a type of Farming, known as 'Natural Farming' or Zero Budget farming doesn't need Chemicals or tractors. Natural fertilizers made out of cow dung and urine are used. The results are fantastic. Such farming is the only panacea in these conditions. The question of Farmer suicides will never arise.
10 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic Cwar may erupt with higher castes also asking for reservations.
MG Singh wrote:
rambabu wrote:
Now, what's happening in HaryanA where The Jat community is agitating for reservations. And this Reservation fever is spreading to other parts of the country. This situation is unwelcome. It goes without saying, the country is breaking in to small states. This in turn is a hazard that leads to weakening of this country. This situation will be used by our enemies. Country cannot develop. In a nutshell it all tantamount to Civil war. We will be fighting with each other.
You are right. India is heading in wrong direction and in years to come it will be worse. I blame Dr. Ambedkar who incorporated this retrograde step of reservation in the constitution. I don't know what will happen but surgery by Army rule will be a help and the President must act. History will damn him otherwise.
Without digging the past or wasting time who is responsible for reservations, it's wise to take care of the present, which is pointing towards Civil war. Unless, this threatening situation is handled, India's future is endangered.
10 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic why men imagine women are attracted to them .
MG Singh wrote:
rambabu wrote:
Jincy Aby wrote:
usha manohar wrote:
Jincy Aby wrote:
The body structure of women always attract men towards her. God creates people as male and female for attracting each other. It is a natural phenomenon. Nothing wrong in that. But do not misuse this opportunity. Men have the tendency to misuse women if circumstances are fit for them because sexual feelings in men are higher than women. Women always should be careful in their dressings.
What exactly does careful mean ? Dis all the rapists who raped toddlers and babies d so because they were not dressed " Carefully' ? I think it is precisely this mindset and attitude by both women and men , especially women that breeds such an attitude among men !
I never say that all reasons behind rape is indecent dressing style of ladies. But this is one of the major reasons behind rape. Men with very poor personality always have the tendency to rape toddlers and babies also even if they are well dressed. They exploit ladies and babies because of their personality disorder.
Whether you agree or disagree, this is a fact that the ladies who expose sensitive parts of their body make men to be sexually attracted to them. We can avoid much of rape, if ladies can give little care while dressing.
Its a misconception to think that, if women are dressed covering the entire body, many atrocities on women can be reduced. Sex maniacs do not spare even the older women even a school going kid. Dressing may be one of the reasons for crimes like rapes. But not the only reason.
I wonder if people who talk of dress as a enticement of rape have studied the psychology of man. Many psychologists have opined a man will rape irrespective of dress. I will dismiss such comments out of hand. The most revealing dresses are worn in Denmark, where I have been and next to my cousins house, girls used to sunbathe in nude, but no rape. How silly can some Indian men get !!!!
You are right, Women, despite wearing a dress that covers her body are safe ?. For sex maniacs, dress will not be a hindrance to commit rape.
10 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic Lowest cost smartphone at just Rs. 251..
anil wrote:
rambabu wrote:
anil wrote:
rambabu wrote:
Babu saroj wrote:
rambabu wrote:
Now the product is in the market. Test for yourself.
Sir have you seen . do you test it yourself.
Why do you bother about others. You are going to use it and you will check. I have a Smartphone already. I don't need another. Check from your Dealer.
If it available in market before closing of booking, than what is need of advance booking.
Compared to the Bookings, the Smartphones supplied in the first phase are very less. In phase wise, the remaining phones will be supplied. That's why the bookings stopped.
According to latest news, Mohit Goel confirmed that Smartphone Freedom 251 will be supplied by all means. Goel further added that on Feb 18, Ringing bells registered 7 crores Registrations. In the first phase only 25 lakh registration are approved. The income received from the online buyers will be kept in a separate account and the organization collects that income only after the delivery of Freedom 251.
He added on every phone the organization earns a profit of Rs. 31
They approve only 25 lakh registration, what happen of others.
Every person who registered online will get the Smartphone in phases. The response was overwhelming, which the Ringing bells did not expect.
10 years ago
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
rambabu wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
rambabu wrote:
anil wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
anil wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
The whole incident reminds me of the bollywood movie Maachis where an innocent youth was picked up by the police. It actually happens and for the police the soft target is the innocent young minds and ultimately their lives get thrashed. If we go by the media report then we are now very sure about one fact that the JNU student's union President got falsely implicated. This is not a fair handling of a situation.
Now this case is in court, SC refused for bail of president of JNU. It is job of court declare some one innocent or guilty. What you write here may be right but why president called meeting in university campus without permission of Adm.
SC did not refuse the bail but it said that he must file the bail petition in HC first and that's why it did not hear the case. I know it is in the court but, do you think we should not have any voice about any case which is in court? We can easily discuss issues among ourselves. Next is if anyone called a meeting without permission means he/she is anti-nationalists, isn't it too much?
Don't forgot agenda of meeting. Afzal guru! It is opinion that one should not be allowed to favor a person who is punished by court.
The very purpose of the meeting was to protest against the hanging of Afzal Guru.
He is not yet punished by the court so I think everyone has the right to opine. Secondly, you must not forget that even The Delhi Police Commissioner has stated that if the accused student make a bail plea then the police department will not oppose it. I think this whole episode is quite deep rooted so we from outside should not judge on the basis of what we are made to see. I always feel that we come up with judgement very easily when the accused is not our own but that's not fair when we know that in many ways students do get trapped. So, let's pray that if the accused is really responsible for all kind of negative protests then he should not be spared but if otherwise then his life should not be shunted as it is being done now.
I'm amazed seeing those who still think that innocents are framed by the Administration of the university and the central Government. What happened in JNU and aftermath is a clear cut case of Treason.
Culprits must be punished.
Don't assume and come to a conclusion. None in this thread has accused the administration of JNU and the Central Government. For God's sake don't try to cut everyone's opinion because all are free to opine. You are free to speak your mind but don't comment accusingly.
Reading your comments reminds me of old times when Hindus always justified all illogical things. So sad and one can see how even now the Hindus will lose. The reason is clear.
10 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic Anti India slogan in JNU, Delhi.
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
MG Singh wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
rambabu wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
rambabu wrote:
anil wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
anil wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
The whole incident reminds me of the bollywood movie Maachis where an innocent youth was picked up by the police. It actually happens and for the police the soft target is the innocent young minds and ultimately their lives get thrashed. If we go by the media report then we are now very sure about one fact that the JNU student's union President got falsely implicated. This is not a fair handling of a situation.
Now this case is in court, SC refused for bail of president of JNU. It is job of court declare some one innocent or guilty. What you write here may be right but why president called meeting in university campus without permission of Adm.
SC did not refuse the bail but it said that he must file the bail petition in HC first and that's why it did not hear the case. I know it is in the court but, do you think we should not have any voice about any case which is in court? We can easily discuss issues among ourselves. Next is if anyone called a meeting without permission means he/she is anti-nationalists, isn't it too much?
Don't forgot agenda of meeting. Afzal guru! It is opinion that one should not be allowed to favor a person who is punished by court.
The very purpose of the meeting was to protest against the hanging of Afzal Guru.
He is not yet punished by the court so I think everyone has the right to opine. Secondly, you must not forget that even The Delhi Police Commissioner has stated that if the accused student make a bail plea then the police department will not oppose it. I think this whole episode is quite deep rooted so we from outside should not judge on the basis of what we are made to see. I always feel that we come up with judgement very easily when the accused is not our own but that's not fair when we know that in many ways students do get trapped. So, let's pray that if the accused is really responsible for all kind of negative protests then he should not be spared but if otherwise then his life should not be shunted as it is being done now.
I'm amazed seeing those who still think that innocents are framed by the Administration of the university and the central Government. What happened in JNU and aftermath is a clear cut case of Treason.
Culprits must be punished.
Don't assume and come to a conclusion. None in this thread has accused the administration of JNU and the Central Government. For God's sake don't try to cut everyone's opinion because all are free to opine. You are free to speak your mind but don't comment accusingly.
Reading your comments reminds me of old times when Hindus always justified all illogical things. So sad and one can see how even now the Hindus will lose. The reason is clear.
I am not here to justify your thinking so it's up to you to reach to a conclusion.
Members are free to express their respective opinions on this platform.
10 years ago
Shampa Sadhya replied to the topic A Letter of Divorce Threat is a Cruelty .
usha manohar wrote:
Written by Shampa Sadhya
What's your opinion regarding the judgement given by the High Court in the case? Link is given below:
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Wifes-letter-talking-of-divorce-remarriage-an-act-of-cruelty-HC/articleshow/51084192.cms
I truly support the judgement. Blackmailing of any kind should not be permitted.
As expected some Indian men would clap their hands at the judgment but an extremely unfair and immature judgment in my opinion, where the wife's feelings have not been taken into account but one single letter written by her probably out of frustration due to loneliness, has been taken as evidence. No mention whether the husband tried to rectify the situation, which is what a husband would do if he wants to set things right instead of keeping the letter for so many years and making an issue ! I feel the wife should be happy at the decision given by the court rather than challenging it because the fellow is simply not worth the trouble !
Being a woman still I support the decision. It is true that among a couple sometimes such conversations do take place but the article pinpoints that the lady got years in between to clarify this doubt but she did not do it. If the man had done so then I would have opined against that man. Among couples blackmailing should not make an inroad.
10 years ago
Shampa Sadhya replied to the topic A lovely gift from a sweet friend.....
Kalyani Nandurkar wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
@Kalyani Nandurkar Well, I don't know who this friend of yours is but I must say that she chose a beautiful gift for you. It's really a wonderful gift.
Thanks you Shampa, It is from Swetha Shenoy, one of the oldest members of boddunan, right from the days when boddunan was started, but she does not come in much due to time constraints.
It seems I have never come across any post of hers. Well, let me take the privilege to wish you: Belated Happy Birthday! Be happy and prosper always.
10 years ago
Shampa Sadhya replied to the topic Anti India slogan in JNU, Delhi.
MG Singh wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
rambabu wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
rambabu wrote:
anil wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
anil wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
The whole incident reminds me of the bollywood movie Maachis where an innocent youth was picked up by the police. It actually happens and for the police the soft target is the innocent young minds and ultimately their lives get thrashed. If we go by the media report then we are now very sure about one fact that the JNU student's union President got falsely implicated. This is not a fair handling of a situation.
Now this case is in court, SC refused for bail of president of JNU. It is job of court declare some one innocent or guilty. What you write here may be right but why president called meeting in university campus without permission of Adm.
SC did not refuse the bail but it said that he must file the bail petition in HC first and that's why it did not hear the case. I know it is in the court but, do you think we should not have any voice about any case which is in court? We can easily discuss issues among ourselves. Next is if anyone called a meeting without permission means he/she is anti-nationalists, isn't it too much?
Don't forgot agenda of meeting. Afzal guru! It is opinion that one should not be allowed to favor a person who is punished by court.
The very purpose of the meeting was to protest against the hanging of Afzal Guru.
He is not yet punished by the court so I think everyone has the right to opine. Secondly, you must not forget that even The Delhi Police Commissioner has stated that if the accused student make a bail plea then the police department will not oppose it. I think this whole episode is quite deep rooted so we from outside should not judge on the basis of what we are made to see. I always feel that we come up with judgement very easily when the accused is not our own but that's not fair when we know that in many ways students do get trapped. So, let's pray that if the accused is really responsible for all kind of negative protests then he should not be spared but if otherwise then his life should not be shunted as it is being done now.
I'm amazed seeing those who still think that innocents are framed by the Administration of the university and the central Government. What happened in JNU and aftermath is a clear cut case of Treason.
Culprits must be punished.
Don't assume and come to a conclusion. None in this thread has accused the administration of JNU and the Central Government. For God's sake don't try to cut everyone's opinion because all are free to opine. You are free to speak your mind but don't comment accusingly.
Reading your comments reminds me of old times when Hindus always justified all illogical things. So sad and one can see how even now the Hindus will lose. The reason is clear.
I am not here to justify your thinking so it's up to you to reach to a conclusion.
10 years ago
MG Singh replied to the topic Anti India slogan in JNU, Delhi.
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
rambabu wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
rambabu wrote:
anil wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
anil wrote:
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
The whole incident reminds me of the bollywood movie Maachis where an innocent youth was picked up by the police. It actually happens and for the police the soft target is the innocent young minds and ultimately their lives get thrashed. If we go by the media report then we are now very sure about one fact that the JNU student's union President got falsely implicated. This is not a fair handling of a situation.
Now this case is in court, SC refused for bail of president of JNU. It is job of court declare some one innocent or guilty. What you write here may be right but why president called meeting in university campus without permission of Adm.
SC did not refuse the bail but it said that he must file the bail petition in HC first and that's why it did not hear the case. I know it is in the court but, do you think we should not have any voice about any case which is in court? We can easily discuss issues among ourselves. Next is if anyone called a meeting without permission means he/she is anti-nationalists, isn't it too much?
Don't forgot agenda of meeting. Afzal guru! It is opinion that one should not be allowed to favor a person who is punished by court.
The very purpose of the meeting was to protest against the hanging of Afzal Guru.
He is not yet punished by the court so I think everyone has the right to opine. Secondly, you must not forget that even The Delhi Police Commissioner has stated that if the accused student make a bail plea then the police department will not oppose it. I think this whole episode is quite deep rooted so we from outside should not judge on the basis of what we are made to see. I always feel that we come up with judgement very easily when the accused is not our own but that's not fair when we know that in many ways students do get trapped. So, let's pray that if the accused is really responsible for all kind of negative protests then he should not be spared but if otherwise then his life should not be shunted as it is being done now.
I'm amazed seeing those who still think that innocents are framed by the Administration of the university and the central Government. What happened in JNU and aftermath is a clear cut case of Treason.
Culprits must be punished.
Don't assume and come to a conclusion. None in this thread has accused the administration of JNU and the Central Government. For God's sake don't try to cut everyone's opinion because all are free to opine. You are free to speak your mind but don't comment accusingly.
Reading your comments reminds me of old times when Hindus always justified all illogical things. So sad and one can see how even now the Hindus will lose. The reason is clear.
10 years ago
anil replied to the topic Lowest cost smartphone at just Rs. 251..
rambabu wrote:
anil wrote:
rambabu wrote:
Babu saroj wrote:
rambabu wrote:
Now the product is in the market. Test for yourself.
Sir have you seen . do you test it yourself.
Why do you bother about others. You are going to use it and you will check. I have a Smartphone already. I don't need another. Check from your Dealer.
If it available in market before closing of booking, than what is need of advance booking.
Compared to the Bookings, the Smartphones supplied in the first phase are very less. In phase wise, the remaining phones will be supplied. That's why the bookings stopped.
According to latest news, Mohit Goel confirmed that Smartphone Freedom 251 will be supplied by all means. Goel further added that on Feb 18, Ringing bells registered 7 crores Registrations. In the first phase only 25 lakh registration are approved. The income received from the online buyers will be kept in a separate account and the organization collects that income only after the delivery of Freedom 251.
He added on every phone the organization earns a profit of Rs. 31
They approve only 25 lakh registration, what happen of others.
10 years ago