OpenMeans Forum
Welcome, Guest
Recent activity
anil replied to the topic Salman Khan released in hit and run case.
rambabu wrote:
anil wrote:
usha manohar wrote:
Apparently Salman Khan and Salim have spent 25 crores of rupees " To Prove Him Innocent " , which goes to show how our judiciary works ! I doubt if an ordinary person even if he is innocent needs to spend that kind of money to prove he is innocent and that our courts that expensive, so where did the 25 crores go?
http://movies.ndtv.com/bollywood/salim-khan-on-salman-walking-away-what-about-tension-rs-20-cr-spent-1253888
No need to say where these 25 corees go. Every one know. I think we all did not forgot Jasika lal murder case. It is proved that justice for ordinary peoples is not possible.
Justice is a commodity that can be purchased from the Market. Only thing is you should have enough money to buy it. That's why Justice is not for the poor, but to stinking rich.
Yes right, but some exception, Bapu Asha Ram
9 years ago
anil answered the question What are some of the good financial books one should read to become an equity research analyst?.
Book of finance management is help full for you. focus on ratio analaysis.
9 years ago
usha manohar liked a reply to the topic Lesser known facts of Indian history - Shivaji Maharaj was indeed the greatest of all!.
9 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic Salman Khan released in hit and run case.
anil wrote:
usha manohar wrote:
Apparently Salman Khan and Salim have spent 25 crores of rupees " To Prove Him Innocent " , which goes to show how our judiciary works ! I doubt if an ordinary person even if he is innocent needs to spend that kind of money to prove he is innocent and that our courts that expensive, so where did the 25 crores go?
http://movies.ndtv.com/bollywood/salim-khan-on-salman-walking-away-what-about-tension-rs-20-cr-spent-1253888
No need to say where these 25 corees go. Every one know. I think we all did not forgot Jasika lal murder case. It is proved that justice for ordinary peoples is not possible.
Justice is a commodity that can be purchased from the Market. Only thing is you should have enough money to buy it. That's why Justice is not for the poor, but to stinking rich.
9 years ago
anil answered the question What can be done to improve Indians' living condition?.
Population control is only and only solution to upgrade living standard. Second thing control population education and specially women education is very helpful. Corruption is also cause of poverty in our country.
9 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic Lesser known facts of Indian history - Shivaji Maharaj was indeed the greatest of all!.
anil wrote:
usha manohar wrote:
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
Many club British with Muslim rulers to give the impression that Muslims were outsiders. The fact is that most of us are descendants of foreigners. The only original inhabitants are the tribal and Dravidian. It is totally wrong to describe the medieval era as foreign rule. It is this perverted thinking that made the RSS/ VHP functionaries state that Modi is first Hindu ruler after Shivaji. The British never adopted or treated India as their own country. The British Indian government functioned under guidance and control of Great Britain. The Governor General was appointed by British Government in London. India was never home to British people unlike Muslims who adopted and treated India as their own. Most Muslim rulers were born in India and were Indian in true sense. To dub them as foreigner is just a trick to attack secular ideals and promote so called Hindutva and Hindu Rashtra.
While it makes sense that muslim rulers though they were invaders, did adapt to India , many of them were never tolerant with Hindu religion and this is a fact that is learnt in History lessons.They converted forcibly .A few like Akbar were more tolerant realising that force did not work. To bring out this truth is not wrong since Bharat has always been a Hindu Rashtra since the times of Mahabharat , so no point in denying it and also whitewashing the mughal rule which was anything but secular ..
sir you said that most of us are foreigners. Please tell me from where we came in this country. Which is our native place?
Such distorted facts that we are all foreigners is unacceptable. Our Country is Bharat and we are all the inhabitants of this sacred country.
9 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic What Congress want to show by disturbing the Parliament work?.
anil wrote:
Manoj Kumar Lamba wrote:
rambabu wrote:
The Message that the Congress party wants to send to the public is " we are the fools who never learn from our Past. We are the fools who never learn the reason for unceremoniously kicked by the people."
True the Congress party has not learnt anything from its past. The Public is watching everything and will give punishment during election.
Congress is not worry that public are watching. They know that public will forget all rubbish deed after some time. What happen in Bihar. Public of Bihar forgot that it is Lalu Parasd who was sentenced for 5 years. They forgot that Lalu directly and indirectly ruled in state more than 10 years. but noting done for them.
In a desperate mood Congress is restless mood to come back to power. It's general trend that a political party that lost elections will talk nonsense. Behave in a strange way. I pity Congress.
9 years ago
anil replied to the topic What Congress want to show by disturbing the Parliament work?.
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
This is simple. Congress and BJP both behave similarly. BJP disturbed when in opposition. Now Congress is also behaving exactly as BJP did when in opposition. This is the game that major political parties play.
yes it is right but issue on which congress is doing all these is not right one. court send notice to them, what is fault of Parliament and BJP. It is clear that congress have not faith in judiciary. If congress wants to come back than they must be do positive politics.
9 years ago
anil replied to the topic What Congress want to show by disturbing the Parliament work?.
Manoj Kumar Lamba wrote:
rambabu wrote:
The Message that the Congress party wants to send to the public is " we are the fools who never learn from our Past. We are the fools who never learn the reason for unceremoniously kicked by the people."
True the Congress party has not learnt anything from its past. The Public is watching everything and will give punishment during election.
Congress is not worry that public are watching. They know that public will forget all rubbish deed after some time. What happen in Bihar. Public of Bihar forgot that it is Lalu Parasd who was sentenced for 5 years. They forgot that Lalu directly and indirectly ruled in state more than 10 years. but noting done for them.
9 years ago
anil replied to the topic Lesser known facts of Indian history - Shivaji Maharaj was indeed the greatest of all!.
rambabu wrote:
Our History Books should be rewritten. Somewhere I read, Akbar is not as tolerant towards Hindus as written in History Books written by Foreign Historians. In Chittorgarh war Akbar ordered to massacre thousands of Rajput Prisoners of war including women and children. Please correct me Gulatiji if I'm wrong.
Massacre and insult of women was very common act of winners. It is not possible to rewrite history.
9 years ago
anil replied to the topic Lesser known facts of Indian history - Shivaji Maharaj was indeed the greatest of all!.
usha manohar wrote:
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
Many club British with Muslim rulers to give the impression that Muslims were outsiders. The fact is that most of us are descendants of foreigners. The only original inhabitants are the tribal and Dravidian. It is totally wrong to describe the medieval era as foreign rule. It is this perverted thinking that made the RSS/ VHP functionaries state that Modi is first Hindu ruler after Shivaji. The British never adopted or treated India as their own country. The British Indian government functioned under guidance and control of Great Britain. The Governor General was appointed by British Government in London. India was never home to British people unlike Muslims who adopted and treated India as their own. Most Muslim rulers were born in India and were Indian in true sense. To dub them as foreigner is just a trick to attack secular ideals and promote so called Hindutva and Hindu Rashtra.
While it makes sense that muslim rulers though they were invaders, did adapt to India , many of them were never tolerant with Hindu religion and this is a fact that is learnt in History lessons.They converted forcibly .A few like Akbar were more tolerant realising that force did not work. To bring out this truth is not wrong since Bharat has always been a Hindu Rashtra since the times of Mahabharat , so no point in denying it and also whitewashing the mughal rule which was anything but secular ..
sir you writing that most of us are foreigners. Please tell me from where we came in this country. Which is our native place?
9 years ago
anil replied to the topic Salman Khan released in hit and run case.
usha manohar wrote:
Apparently Salman Khan and Salim have spent 25 crores of rupees " To Prove Him Innocent " , which goes to show how our judiciary works ! I doubt if an ordinary person even if he is innocent needs to spend that kind of money to prove he is innocent and that our courts that expensive, so where did the 25 crores go?
http://movies.ndtv.com/bollywood/salim-khan-on-salman-walking-away-what-about-tension-rs-20-cr-spent-1253888
No need to say where these 25 corees go. Every one know. I think we all did not forgot Jasika lal murder case. It is proved that justice for ordinary peoples is not possible.
9 years ago
anil replied to the topic Salman Khan released in hit and run case.
It is only truth that one people died and four injured by car which was of Salman Khan and and that time Salman Khan was also in the car. Driver of Salman Khan gave statement is this case after 12 years. He come in the picture only to save Salman. It is clear that all thing are manipulated. It is the question, the victim was justice.
9 years ago
took the quiz Quiz on taglines of Indian companies.
This is a Quiz on taglines of Indian companies.lets see how much you know about this.Choose the correct answers from the options given below.
9 years ago
passed the quiz Quiz on taglines of Indian companies.
This is a Quiz on taglines of Indian companies.lets see how much you know about this.Choose the correct answers from the options given below.
9 years ago
Kalyani Nandurkar replied to the topic Salman Khan released in hit and run case.
Ronark Bhardwaj wrote:
Whether Salman khan was driving car or not, i don't know, but i really think that he would have helped the families who suffered from this accident. By giving some money or any other sort of help he would have done to him. Salman khan has enough money, where even if he keeps on donating every day, he won't get bankrupt.
He is one in bollywood, who is a good philantrophist. He keeps on helping and donating. Though donation would be to save taxes or whatever reason, but he does that.
He may have loads of money and he may even have offered to help the families of the victims, which no one knows if he has done or not. However, offering money for killing someone is not justice and will not help the families of the dead. It will not bring them back to life. So calling Salman a good person, a good philanthropist etc. etc. is not at all right for he is one priceless **&^&% and he deserves to be thrown to wild dogs!
9 years ago
Kalyani Nandurkar liked a reply to the topic Lesser known facts of Indian history - Shivaji Maharaj was indeed the greatest of all!.
9 years ago
Kalyani Nandurkar said thank you to usha manohar for his/her reply to the topic Lesser known facts of Indian history - Shivaji Maharaj was indeed the greatest of all!.
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
Many club British with Muslim rulers to give the impression that Muslims were outsiders. The fact is that most of us are descendants of foreigners. The only original inhabitants are the tribal and Dravidian. It is totally wrong to describe the medieval era as foreign rule. It is this perverted thinking that made the RSS/ VHP functionaries state that Modi is first Hindu ruler after Shivaji. The British never adopted or treated India as their own country. The British Indian government functioned under guidance and control of Great Britain. The Governor General was appointed by British Government in London. India was never home to British people unlike Muslims who adopted and treated India as their own. Most Muslim rulers were born in India and were Indian in true sense. To dub them as foreigner is just a trick to attack secular ideals and promote so called Hindutva and Hindu Rashtra.
While it makes sense that muslim rulers though they were invaders, did adapt to India , many of them were never tolerant with Hindu religion and this is a fact that is learnt in History lessons.They converted forcibly .A few like Akbar were more tolerant realising that force did not work. To bring out this truth is not wrong since Bharat has always been a Hindu Rashtra since the times of Mahabharat , so no point in denying it and also whitewashing the mughal rule which was anything but secular ..
9 years ago
anil replied to the topic Salman Khan released in hit and run case.
rambabu wrote:
anil wrote:
usha manohar wrote:
Apparently Salman Khan and Salim have spent 25 crores of rupees " To Prove Him Innocent " , which goes to show how our judiciary works ! I doubt if an ordinary person even if he is innocent needs to spend that kind of money to prove he is innocent and that our courts that expensive, so where did the 25 crores go?
http://movies.ndtv.com/bollywood/salim-khan-on-salman-walking-away-what-about-tension-rs-20-cr-spent-1253888
No need to say where these 25 corees go. Every one know. I think we all did not forgot Jasika lal murder case. It is proved that justice for ordinary peoples is not possible.
Justice is a commodity that can be purchased from the Market. Only thing is you should have enough money to buy it. That's why Justice is not for the poor, but to stinking rich.
Yes right, but some exception, Bapu Asha Ram
9 years ago
anil answered the question What are some of the good financial books one should read to become an equity research analyst?.
Book of finance management is help full for you. focus on ratio analaysis.
9 years ago
usha manohar liked a reply to the topic Lesser known facts of Indian history - Shivaji Maharaj was indeed the greatest of all!.
9 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic Salman Khan released in hit and run case.
anil wrote:
usha manohar wrote:
Apparently Salman Khan and Salim have spent 25 crores of rupees " To Prove Him Innocent " , which goes to show how our judiciary works ! I doubt if an ordinary person even if he is innocent needs to spend that kind of money to prove he is innocent and that our courts that expensive, so where did the 25 crores go?
http://movies.ndtv.com/bollywood/salim-khan-on-salman-walking-away-what-about-tension-rs-20-cr-spent-1253888
No need to say where these 25 corees go. Every one know. I think we all did not forgot Jasika lal murder case. It is proved that justice for ordinary peoples is not possible.
Justice is a commodity that can be purchased from the Market. Only thing is you should have enough money to buy it. That's why Justice is not for the poor, but to stinking rich.
9 years ago
anil answered the question What can be done to improve Indians' living condition?.
Population control is only and only solution to upgrade living standard. Second thing control population education and specially women education is very helpful. Corruption is also cause of poverty in our country.
9 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic Lesser known facts of Indian history - Shivaji Maharaj was indeed the greatest of all!.
anil wrote:
usha manohar wrote:
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
Many club British with Muslim rulers to give the impression that Muslims were outsiders. The fact is that most of us are descendants of foreigners. The only original inhabitants are the tribal and Dravidian. It is totally wrong to describe the medieval era as foreign rule. It is this perverted thinking that made the RSS/ VHP functionaries state that Modi is first Hindu ruler after Shivaji. The British never adopted or treated India as their own country. The British Indian government functioned under guidance and control of Great Britain. The Governor General was appointed by British Government in London. India was never home to British people unlike Muslims who adopted and treated India as their own. Most Muslim rulers were born in India and were Indian in true sense. To dub them as foreigner is just a trick to attack secular ideals and promote so called Hindutva and Hindu Rashtra.
While it makes sense that muslim rulers though they were invaders, did adapt to India , many of them were never tolerant with Hindu religion and this is a fact that is learnt in History lessons.They converted forcibly .A few like Akbar were more tolerant realising that force did not work. To bring out this truth is not wrong since Bharat has always been a Hindu Rashtra since the times of Mahabharat , so no point in denying it and also whitewashing the mughal rule which was anything but secular ..
sir you said that most of us are foreigners. Please tell me from where we came in this country. Which is our native place?
Such distorted facts that we are all foreigners is unacceptable. Our Country is Bharat and we are all the inhabitants of this sacred country.
9 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic What Congress want to show by disturbing the Parliament work?.
anil wrote:
Manoj Kumar Lamba wrote:
rambabu wrote:
The Message that the Congress party wants to send to the public is " we are the fools who never learn from our Past. We are the fools who never learn the reason for unceremoniously kicked by the people."
True the Congress party has not learnt anything from its past. The Public is watching everything and will give punishment during election.
Congress is not worry that public are watching. They know that public will forget all rubbish deed after some time. What happen in Bihar. Public of Bihar forgot that it is Lalu Parasd who was sentenced for 5 years. They forgot that Lalu directly and indirectly ruled in state more than 10 years. but noting done for them.
In a desperate mood Congress is restless mood to come back to power. It's general trend that a political party that lost elections will talk nonsense. Behave in a strange way. I pity Congress.
9 years ago
anil replied to the topic What Congress want to show by disturbing the Parliament work?.
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
This is simple. Congress and BJP both behave similarly. BJP disturbed when in opposition. Now Congress is also behaving exactly as BJP did when in opposition. This is the game that major political parties play.
yes it is right but issue on which congress is doing all these is not right one. court send notice to them, what is fault of Parliament and BJP. It is clear that congress have not faith in judiciary. If congress wants to come back than they must be do positive politics.
9 years ago
anil replied to the topic What Congress want to show by disturbing the Parliament work?.
Manoj Kumar Lamba wrote:
rambabu wrote:
The Message that the Congress party wants to send to the public is " we are the fools who never learn from our Past. We are the fools who never learn the reason for unceremoniously kicked by the people."
True the Congress party has not learnt anything from its past. The Public is watching everything and will give punishment during election.
Congress is not worry that public are watching. They know that public will forget all rubbish deed after some time. What happen in Bihar. Public of Bihar forgot that it is Lalu Parasd who was sentenced for 5 years. They forgot that Lalu directly and indirectly ruled in state more than 10 years. but noting done for them.
9 years ago
anil replied to the topic Lesser known facts of Indian history - Shivaji Maharaj was indeed the greatest of all!.
rambabu wrote:
Our History Books should be rewritten. Somewhere I read, Akbar is not as tolerant towards Hindus as written in History Books written by Foreign Historians. In Chittorgarh war Akbar ordered to massacre thousands of Rajput Prisoners of war including women and children. Please correct me Gulatiji if I'm wrong.
Massacre and insult of women was very common act of winners. It is not possible to rewrite history.
9 years ago
anil replied to the topic Lesser known facts of Indian history - Shivaji Maharaj was indeed the greatest of all!.
usha manohar wrote:
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
Many club British with Muslim rulers to give the impression that Muslims were outsiders. The fact is that most of us are descendants of foreigners. The only original inhabitants are the tribal and Dravidian. It is totally wrong to describe the medieval era as foreign rule. It is this perverted thinking that made the RSS/ VHP functionaries state that Modi is first Hindu ruler after Shivaji. The British never adopted or treated India as their own country. The British Indian government functioned under guidance and control of Great Britain. The Governor General was appointed by British Government in London. India was never home to British people unlike Muslims who adopted and treated India as their own. Most Muslim rulers were born in India and were Indian in true sense. To dub them as foreigner is just a trick to attack secular ideals and promote so called Hindutva and Hindu Rashtra.
While it makes sense that muslim rulers though they were invaders, did adapt to India , many of them were never tolerant with Hindu religion and this is a fact that is learnt in History lessons.They converted forcibly .A few like Akbar were more tolerant realising that force did not work. To bring out this truth is not wrong since Bharat has always been a Hindu Rashtra since the times of Mahabharat , so no point in denying it and also whitewashing the mughal rule which was anything but secular ..
sir you writing that most of us are foreigners. Please tell me from where we came in this country. Which is our native place?
9 years ago
anil replied to the topic Salman Khan released in hit and run case.
usha manohar wrote:
Apparently Salman Khan and Salim have spent 25 crores of rupees " To Prove Him Innocent " , which goes to show how our judiciary works ! I doubt if an ordinary person even if he is innocent needs to spend that kind of money to prove he is innocent and that our courts that expensive, so where did the 25 crores go?
http://movies.ndtv.com/bollywood/salim-khan-on-salman-walking-away-what-about-tension-rs-20-cr-spent-1253888
No need to say where these 25 corees go. Every one know. I think we all did not forgot Jasika lal murder case. It is proved that justice for ordinary peoples is not possible.
9 years ago
anil replied to the topic Salman Khan released in hit and run case.
It is only truth that one people died and four injured by car which was of Salman Khan and and that time Salman Khan was also in the car. Driver of Salman Khan gave statement is this case after 12 years. He come in the picture only to save Salman. It is clear that all thing are manipulated. It is the question, the victim was justice.
9 years ago
took the quiz Quiz on taglines of Indian companies.
This is a Quiz on taglines of Indian companies.lets see how much you know about this.Choose the correct answers from the options given below.
9 years ago
passed the quiz Quiz on taglines of Indian companies.
This is a Quiz on taglines of Indian companies.lets see how much you know about this.Choose the correct answers from the options given below.
9 years ago
Kalyani Nandurkar replied to the topic Salman Khan released in hit and run case.
Ronark Bhardwaj wrote:
Whether Salman khan was driving car or not, i don't know, but i really think that he would have helped the families who suffered from this accident. By giving some money or any other sort of help he would have done to him. Salman khan has enough money, where even if he keeps on donating every day, he won't get bankrupt.
He is one in bollywood, who is a good philantrophist. He keeps on helping and donating. Though donation would be to save taxes or whatever reason, but he does that.
He may have loads of money and he may even have offered to help the families of the victims, which no one knows if he has done or not. However, offering money for killing someone is not justice and will not help the families of the dead. It will not bring them back to life. So calling Salman a good person, a good philanthropist etc. etc. is not at all right for he is one priceless **&^&% and he deserves to be thrown to wild dogs!
9 years ago
Kalyani Nandurkar liked a reply to the topic Lesser known facts of Indian history - Shivaji Maharaj was indeed the greatest of all!.
9 years ago
Kalyani Nandurkar said thank you to usha manohar for his/her reply to the topic Lesser known facts of Indian history - Shivaji Maharaj was indeed the greatest of all!.
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
Many club British with Muslim rulers to give the impression that Muslims were outsiders. The fact is that most of us are descendants of foreigners. The only original inhabitants are the tribal and Dravidian. It is totally wrong to describe the medieval era as foreign rule. It is this perverted thinking that made the RSS/ VHP functionaries state that Modi is first Hindu ruler after Shivaji. The British never adopted or treated India as their own country. The British Indian government functioned under guidance and control of Great Britain. The Governor General was appointed by British Government in London. India was never home to British people unlike Muslims who adopted and treated India as their own. Most Muslim rulers were born in India and were Indian in true sense. To dub them as foreigner is just a trick to attack secular ideals and promote so called Hindutva and Hindu Rashtra.
While it makes sense that muslim rulers though they were invaders, did adapt to India , many of them were never tolerant with Hindu religion and this is a fact that is learnt in History lessons.They converted forcibly .A few like Akbar were more tolerant realising that force did not work. To bring out this truth is not wrong since Bharat has always been a Hindu Rashtra since the times of Mahabharat , so no point in denying it and also whitewashing the mughal rule which was anything but secular ..
9 years ago