OpenMeans Forum
Welcome, Guest
Recent activity
Babu saroj liked a reply to the topic Have we grasped how serious the global issue is ?.
9 years ago
suni51 replied to the topic Salman Khan released in hit and run case.
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
The acquittal of Salman Khan raises certain issues like shortcoming of law or role of money in justice. The rich can easily save themselves from long arms of law. But this need not be linked to popularity of star. An actor's criminal activities are separate from his career as a an actor. Also he is not a murderer. The allegation is of driving vehicle in drunken state, which caused death. This is really bad but he is not a criminal as such. This is just a violation of traffic rules. He has suffered long litigation and perhaps he sill still suffer if government pursues the matter further in supreme court or files review petition. Whatever be the logal position, this has nothing to do with quality of his skill and popularity as an artist. When you go to buy mangoes, you don't bother about conduct of the fruit seller. We don't see a movie on basis of criminal record of film producer, director and the cine cast.
He did not have a driving license at the time of accident, do you still think he did not commit a crime. If proved guilty he will have to face serious consequences.
9 years ago
suni51 replied to the topic Salman Khan released in hit and run case.
And Salman Khan is not the only one but if you see carefully all the political party heads are involved in such activities. You name them and I will provide you their records.
9 years ago
suni51 replied to the topic Atheism and terrorism .
I think their laws will be limited to their own country and as long their citizen do not mind them we have nothing to worry. Besides human right organisation is keeping a watch on them.
9 years ago
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani created new topic Atheism and terrorism .
Who is terrorist? Organizations like al Kaida, ISIS are related to Islamic movement. There have been terrorists in Christian tradition as well. Some times, extreme Hindu organizations like Sanatan are also called terrorist. But now Saudi Arabia law lists atheism as terrorism. This is obviously to victimize all dissenters. Anyone who does not follow Islamic tradition or thought according to the whims and fancy of Saudi Arab rulers can be dubbed as atheist and victimized.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/saudi-arabia-declares-all-atheists-are-terrorists-in-new-law-to-crack-down-on-political-dissidents-9228389.html
9 years ago
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani replied to the topic Salman Khan released in hit and run case.
The acquittal of Salman Khan raises certain issues like shortcoming of law or role of money in justice. The rich can easily save themselves from long arms of law. But this need not be linked to popularity of star. An actor's criminal activities are separate from his career as a an actor. Also he is not a murderer. The allegation is of driving vehicle in drunken state, which caused death. This is really bad but he is not a criminal as such. This is just a violation of traffic rules. He has suffered long litigation and perhaps he sill still suffer if government pursues the matter further in supreme court or files review petition. Whatever be the logal position, this has nothing to do with quality of his skill and popularity as an artist. When you go to buy mangoes, you don't bother about conduct of the fruit seller. We don't see a movie on basis of criminal record of film producer, director and the cine cast.
9 years ago
Kalyani Nandurkar replied to the topic Salman Khan released in hit and run case.
MG Singh wrote:
i think a little bit of personal experience will help here. I was in Mumbai at the time this accident took place. There is no doubt that Salman was driving the carand that was common knowledge, unfortunately teh law in India works only for the rich. But perhaps it happens in USA also .I recollect the heiress Patty Hearst was given a Not Guilty verdict though she had shot dead a man.
So nothing surprising. Money has flown like water in this judgement. Even if there is an appeal you can expect the SC to acquit him. He will also be let off in the Back Buck killing case, for which he is sentenced to 5 years RI. This is India and yet the pseudo secularists and rationalists will hail this judgement as a " great " verdict.
But I am clear on one thing, when this man looks at himself in the mirror he will realise he is a liar and a killer. The cosmic law will punish him in its own way Amen !
Amen! BUt it is so disgusting to see so many people drooling at the sight of him and thronging the cinema halls to watch his third class movies and making him richer and richer by the day, in spite of common knowledge that he is a horrible person! On top of that, I just bear to see his audacity of selling those Being Human clothes!
9 years ago
MG Singh replied to the topic Salman Khan released in hit and run case.
i think a little bit of personal experience will help here. I was in Mumbai at the time this accident took place. There is no doubt that Salman was driving the carand that was common knowledge, unfortunately teh law in India works only for the rich. But perhaps it happens in USA also .I recollect the heiress Patty Hearst was given a Not Guilty verdict though she had shot dead a man.
So nothing surprising. Money has flown like water in this judgement. Even if there is an appeal you can expect the SC to acquit him. He will also be let off in the Back Buck killing case, for which he is sentenced to 5 years RI. This is India and yet the pseudo secularists and rationalists will hail this judgement as a " great " verdict.
But I am clear on one thing, when this man looks at himself in the mirror he will realise he is a liar and a killer. The cosmic law will punish him in its own way Amen !
9 years ago
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani said thank you to usha manohar for his/her reply to the topic Education vs Religion.
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
usha manohar wrote:
Rational thinking is not something that is learnt, it is internal and a personality trait that gets developed as one grows ..There are no set rationalistic ideas because even a person who thinks he is rational may seem irrational to others at times ..So, essentially the more you brand yourself and slot yourself the more irrational you and your attitude looks because it is not natural.
One does not become a rationalist just by proclaiming so. a rationalist is one who thinks independently to arrive at a conclusion. Also, he must not be rigid. He should be ready to listen to conflicting views and change himself if his prior views prove wrong.
Very true, a true rationalist is one who is broadminded enough to listen to all points of view and not being judgmental and rigid about anything ...I have a neighbor who in my opinion is a true liberated rationalist. He has a beard and a pigtail like most south Indian temple priests have and one can easily mistake him for a radical Hindu. It is only when you speak and have interactions with him that you realise how sane and up to date his views are on any issue ! So, we cannot go by the appearance nor by the background of the person..
9 years ago
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani replied to the topic Lesser known facts of Indian history - Shivaji Maharaj was indeed the greatest of all!.
rambabu wrote:
anil wrote:
usha manohar wrote:
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
Many club British with Muslim rulers to give the impression that Muslims were outsiders. The fact is that most of us are descendants of foreigners. The only original inhabitants are the tribal and Dravidian. It is totally wrong to describe the medieval era as foreign rule. It is this perverted thinking that made the RSS/ VHP functionaries state that Modi is first Hindu ruler after Shivaji. The British never adopted or treated India as their own country. The British Indian government functioned under guidance and control of Great Britain. The Governor General was appointed by British Government in London. India was never home to British people unlike Muslims who adopted and treated India as their own. Most Muslim rulers were born in India and were Indian in true sense. To dub them as foreigner is just a trick to attack secular ideals and promote so called Hindutva and Hindu Rashtra.
While it makes sense that muslim rulers though they were invaders, did adapt to India , many of them were never tolerant with Hindu religion and this is a fact that is learnt in History lessons.They converted forcibly .A few like Akbar were more tolerant realising that force did not work. To bring out this truth is not wrong since Bharat has always been a Hindu Rashtra since the times of Mahabharat , so no point in denying it and also whitewashing the mughal rule which was anything but secular ..
sir you said that most of us are foreigners. Please tell me from where we came in this country. Which is our native place?
Such distorted facts that we are all foreigners is unacceptable. Our Country is Bharat and we are all the inhabitants of this sacred country.
Of course, we are all Indians and India is our country. As I wrote in an earlier post, India is a melting pot of different ethnic races that came from outside. All mingled and lost their separate identity. Only British remained outsiders and went back to their native place after our independence. The comment that only Dravidian and tribal are original inhabitants of this country is just a retort to those who talk of thousand years of slavery and consider only Hindus as Indians and wish to send all non Hindus to Pakistan or elsewhere.
9 years ago
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani liked a reply to the topic Lesser known facts of Indian history - Shivaji Maharaj was indeed the greatest of all!.
9 years ago
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani replied to the topic What Congress want to show by disturbing the Parliament work?.
anil wrote:
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
This is simple. Congress and BJP both behave similarly. BJP disturbed when in opposition. Now Congress is also behaving exactly as BJP did when in opposition. This is the game that major political parties play.
yes it is right but issue on which congress is doing all these is not right one. court send notice to them, what is fault of Parliament and BJP. It is clear that congress have not faith in judiciary. If congress wants to come back than they must be do positive politics.
What we need to understand is that the major political parties are same in content. These are like same wine in different bottles. These all come to power in negative politics of each other by turn. his is the real meaning of two party parliamentary democracy.
9 years ago
suni51 replied to the topic What Congress want to show by disturbing the Parliament work?.
Congress is so desperate, and working for one family without taking the nation in account. They know they have nothing to lose but everything to gain.
9 years ago
Shampa Sadhya said thank you to Babu saroj for his/her reply to the topic Help needed regarding question and answer section.
it means that you got your answer of your question which you posted. And you accepted that, as the answer of your question.
9 years ago
Shampa Sadhya said thank you to suni51 for his/her reply to the topic Help needed regarding question and answer section.
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
I am not getting it. What is to be re-opened? kindly tell me what is to be done once an answer his received from a fellow user. Do you mean to say that once I accept an answer then nobody will be able to answer any more? Please explain it very clearly. Sorry for not being able to understand the point.
Once you have selected the best answer for your question that closes that particular topic. In case you wish to reopen it you can do that but I will suggest you to forget it and ask another matching question.
9 years ago
Ronark Bhardwaj answered the question Which state will you choose?.
Life is never going to perfect as you want. We have to deal with extreme conditions everyday. We always try to go towards perfection, that is all about life. Neither i want myself to be handicaped nor want to have tension. But, this is not in my hand. We keep on try all our life to be life, but someday, we have to see bad times. That is the place where you are been tested in your life.
9 years ago
Ronark Bhardwaj answered the question What can be done to improve Indians' living condition?.
We talk about population control. But i think Government's role is also important. They need to bring out schemes which are favouring labors of our people. They need to first make the lower segment of people strong and make them believe that if they work hard, they could live a well settle live. They can also be rich. I am happy that government has to come out with plans like " Make in India" where more work is given to locals. Skill talent enhancement is all we need in this country. Living of people will keep on increasing.
9 years ago
Babu saroj liked a reply to the topic Have we grasped how serious the global issue is ?.
9 years ago
suni51 replied to the topic Salman Khan released in hit and run case.
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
The acquittal of Salman Khan raises certain issues like shortcoming of law or role of money in justice. The rich can easily save themselves from long arms of law. But this need not be linked to popularity of star. An actor's criminal activities are separate from his career as a an actor. Also he is not a murderer. The allegation is of driving vehicle in drunken state, which caused death. This is really bad but he is not a criminal as such. This is just a violation of traffic rules. He has suffered long litigation and perhaps he sill still suffer if government pursues the matter further in supreme court or files review petition. Whatever be the logal position, this has nothing to do with quality of his skill and popularity as an artist. When you go to buy mangoes, you don't bother about conduct of the fruit seller. We don't see a movie on basis of criminal record of film producer, director and the cine cast.
He did not have a driving license at the time of accident, do you still think he did not commit a crime. If proved guilty he will have to face serious consequences.
9 years ago
suni51 replied to the topic Salman Khan released in hit and run case.
And Salman Khan is not the only one but if you see carefully all the political party heads are involved in such activities. You name them and I will provide you their records.
9 years ago
suni51 replied to the topic Atheism and terrorism .
I think their laws will be limited to their own country and as long their citizen do not mind them we have nothing to worry. Besides human right organisation is keeping a watch on them.
9 years ago
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani created new topic Atheism and terrorism .
Who is terrorist? Organizations like al Kaida, ISIS are related to Islamic movement. There have been terrorists in Christian tradition as well. Some times, extreme Hindu organizations like Sanatan are also called terrorist. But now Saudi Arabia law lists atheism as terrorism. This is obviously to victimize all dissenters. Anyone who does not follow Islamic tradition or thought according to the whims and fancy of Saudi Arab rulers can be dubbed as atheist and victimized.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/saudi-arabia-declares-all-atheists-are-terrorists-in-new-law-to-crack-down-on-political-dissidents-9228389.html
9 years ago
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani replied to the topic Salman Khan released in hit and run case.
The acquittal of Salman Khan raises certain issues like shortcoming of law or role of money in justice. The rich can easily save themselves from long arms of law. But this need not be linked to popularity of star. An actor's criminal activities are separate from his career as a an actor. Also he is not a murderer. The allegation is of driving vehicle in drunken state, which caused death. This is really bad but he is not a criminal as such. This is just a violation of traffic rules. He has suffered long litigation and perhaps he sill still suffer if government pursues the matter further in supreme court or files review petition. Whatever be the logal position, this has nothing to do with quality of his skill and popularity as an artist. When you go to buy mangoes, you don't bother about conduct of the fruit seller. We don't see a movie on basis of criminal record of film producer, director and the cine cast.
9 years ago
Kalyani Nandurkar replied to the topic Salman Khan released in hit and run case.
MG Singh wrote:
i think a little bit of personal experience will help here. I was in Mumbai at the time this accident took place. There is no doubt that Salman was driving the carand that was common knowledge, unfortunately teh law in India works only for the rich. But perhaps it happens in USA also .I recollect the heiress Patty Hearst was given a Not Guilty verdict though she had shot dead a man.
So nothing surprising. Money has flown like water in this judgement. Even if there is an appeal you can expect the SC to acquit him. He will also be let off in the Back Buck killing case, for which he is sentenced to 5 years RI. This is India and yet the pseudo secularists and rationalists will hail this judgement as a " great " verdict.
But I am clear on one thing, when this man looks at himself in the mirror he will realise he is a liar and a killer. The cosmic law will punish him in its own way Amen !
Amen! BUt it is so disgusting to see so many people drooling at the sight of him and thronging the cinema halls to watch his third class movies and making him richer and richer by the day, in spite of common knowledge that he is a horrible person! On top of that, I just bear to see his audacity of selling those Being Human clothes!
9 years ago
MG Singh replied to the topic Salman Khan released in hit and run case.
i think a little bit of personal experience will help here. I was in Mumbai at the time this accident took place. There is no doubt that Salman was driving the carand that was common knowledge, unfortunately teh law in India works only for the rich. But perhaps it happens in USA also .I recollect the heiress Patty Hearst was given a Not Guilty verdict though she had shot dead a man.
So nothing surprising. Money has flown like water in this judgement. Even if there is an appeal you can expect the SC to acquit him. He will also be let off in the Back Buck killing case, for which he is sentenced to 5 years RI. This is India and yet the pseudo secularists and rationalists will hail this judgement as a " great " verdict.
But I am clear on one thing, when this man looks at himself in the mirror he will realise he is a liar and a killer. The cosmic law will punish him in its own way Amen !
9 years ago
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani said thank you to usha manohar for his/her reply to the topic Education vs Religion.
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
usha manohar wrote:
Rational thinking is not something that is learnt, it is internal and a personality trait that gets developed as one grows ..There are no set rationalistic ideas because even a person who thinks he is rational may seem irrational to others at times ..So, essentially the more you brand yourself and slot yourself the more irrational you and your attitude looks because it is not natural.
One does not become a rationalist just by proclaiming so. a rationalist is one who thinks independently to arrive at a conclusion. Also, he must not be rigid. He should be ready to listen to conflicting views and change himself if his prior views prove wrong.
Very true, a true rationalist is one who is broadminded enough to listen to all points of view and not being judgmental and rigid about anything ...I have a neighbor who in my opinion is a true liberated rationalist. He has a beard and a pigtail like most south Indian temple priests have and one can easily mistake him for a radical Hindu. It is only when you speak and have interactions with him that you realise how sane and up to date his views are on any issue ! So, we cannot go by the appearance nor by the background of the person..
9 years ago
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani replied to the topic Lesser known facts of Indian history - Shivaji Maharaj was indeed the greatest of all!.
rambabu wrote:
anil wrote:
usha manohar wrote:
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
Many club British with Muslim rulers to give the impression that Muslims were outsiders. The fact is that most of us are descendants of foreigners. The only original inhabitants are the tribal and Dravidian. It is totally wrong to describe the medieval era as foreign rule. It is this perverted thinking that made the RSS/ VHP functionaries state that Modi is first Hindu ruler after Shivaji. The British never adopted or treated India as their own country. The British Indian government functioned under guidance and control of Great Britain. The Governor General was appointed by British Government in London. India was never home to British people unlike Muslims who adopted and treated India as their own. Most Muslim rulers were born in India and were Indian in true sense. To dub them as foreigner is just a trick to attack secular ideals and promote so called Hindutva and Hindu Rashtra.
While it makes sense that muslim rulers though they were invaders, did adapt to India , many of them were never tolerant with Hindu religion and this is a fact that is learnt in History lessons.They converted forcibly .A few like Akbar were more tolerant realising that force did not work. To bring out this truth is not wrong since Bharat has always been a Hindu Rashtra since the times of Mahabharat , so no point in denying it and also whitewashing the mughal rule which was anything but secular ..
sir you said that most of us are foreigners. Please tell me from where we came in this country. Which is our native place?
Such distorted facts that we are all foreigners is unacceptable. Our Country is Bharat and we are all the inhabitants of this sacred country.
Of course, we are all Indians and India is our country. As I wrote in an earlier post, India is a melting pot of different ethnic races that came from outside. All mingled and lost their separate identity. Only British remained outsiders and went back to their native place after our independence. The comment that only Dravidian and tribal are original inhabitants of this country is just a retort to those who talk of thousand years of slavery and consider only Hindus as Indians and wish to send all non Hindus to Pakistan or elsewhere.
9 years ago
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani liked a reply to the topic Lesser known facts of Indian history - Shivaji Maharaj was indeed the greatest of all!.
9 years ago
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani replied to the topic What Congress want to show by disturbing the Parliament work?.
anil wrote:
Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:
This is simple. Congress and BJP both behave similarly. BJP disturbed when in opposition. Now Congress is also behaving exactly as BJP did when in opposition. This is the game that major political parties play.
yes it is right but issue on which congress is doing all these is not right one. court send notice to them, what is fault of Parliament and BJP. It is clear that congress have not faith in judiciary. If congress wants to come back than they must be do positive politics.
What we need to understand is that the major political parties are same in content. These are like same wine in different bottles. These all come to power in negative politics of each other by turn. his is the real meaning of two party parliamentary democracy.
9 years ago
suni51 replied to the topic What Congress want to show by disturbing the Parliament work?.
Congress is so desperate, and working for one family without taking the nation in account. They know they have nothing to lose but everything to gain.
9 years ago
Shampa Sadhya said thank you to Babu saroj for his/her reply to the topic Help needed regarding question and answer section.
it means that you got your answer of your question which you posted. And you accepted that, as the answer of your question.
9 years ago
Shampa Sadhya said thank you to suni51 for his/her reply to the topic Help needed regarding question and answer section.
Shampa Sadhya wrote:
I am not getting it. What is to be re-opened? kindly tell me what is to be done once an answer his received from a fellow user. Do you mean to say that once I accept an answer then nobody will be able to answer any more? Please explain it very clearly. Sorry for not being able to understand the point.
Once you have selected the best answer for your question that closes that particular topic. In case you wish to reopen it you can do that but I will suggest you to forget it and ask another matching question.
9 years ago
Ronark Bhardwaj answered the question Which state will you choose?.
Life is never going to perfect as you want. We have to deal with extreme conditions everyday. We always try to go towards perfection, that is all about life. Neither i want myself to be handicaped nor want to have tension. But, this is not in my hand. We keep on try all our life to be life, but someday, we have to see bad times. That is the place where you are been tested in your life.
9 years ago
Ronark Bhardwaj answered the question What can be done to improve Indians' living condition?.
We talk about population control. But i think Government's role is also important. They need to bring out schemes which are favouring labors of our people. They need to first make the lower segment of people strong and make them believe that if they work hard, they could live a well settle live. They can also be rich. I am happy that government has to come out with plans like " Make in India" where more work is given to locals. Skill talent enhancement is all we need in this country. Living of people will keep on increasing.
9 years ago