OpenMeans Forum

Guest
Welcome, Guest

Recent activity

It is very sad that these congressis go to any length and the lowest level possible only so that they put one down on Modi. For them, the sole motto of their lives seem to have become is to humiliate and embarass Modi and nothing else. And to do so, they are not stopping from even comiting treason against their own country. Now the Kanhaiya kumar, their latest puppet has joined the monkey brigade claiming that Ishrat was patriot and not a terrorist as as has been proved again and again. Totally sick!
9 years ago
9 years ago
9 years ago
Although the encounter took place in 2004 the case has been kept alive by the media because of the many mysteries surrounding it. It is still an ongoing criminal case in the courts of Gujarat. The encounter of 4 people  including a 19 year old girl Ishrat Jehan took place because they were suspected of plotting to kill Mr Narendra Modi and other BJP leaders..But at that time activists and  the Congress party had questioned this move , claiming that Ishrat was innocent and hounded Modi , with Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi calling him Maut ka saudagar and abusing him several times.. Later, during the interrogation of David Hadley, he admitted that Ishrat was a LET based terrorist . But since he later changed his tune not much came out of it. However, now after investigations more facts are coming to light with fingers directly pointing at Chidambaram the then Home Minister...All the while the Congress party and P Chidambaram knew that Ishrat Jehan was a LET terrorist. Of course for those who know the ins and outs of the Congress party this comes as no surprise since they would go to any lengths to insult Modi . https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XmLFXpxW5d4  
9 years ago
Kalyani Nandurkar wrote: anil wrote: usha manohar wrote: I wish we had a rule here which stops members from repeating the same thing twice or more times in every page.. @ anil, most colleges are co ed now , even in villages because the number of schools are fewer and they need to cater to all the children in the vicinity they cannot afford to have a boys only or girls only schools.. Here in my city it is not true. Here co-education collages are 2 or three but for girls here 5 colleges. It is right that most of schools in rural area are co-ed. government have not source for separate school for boys and girls in rural area.  Rural people still believe in gender discrimination and are still not open-minded where girls are concerned, and believe that boys are superior to girls. That is why girls and boys are not allowed to mingle freely and even they are allowed to, it changes the moment girls reach puberty when she is not allowed to play, allowed to talk to boys etc. It will still take some more time to change all that. I agree. Not only rural people, even the urban people still think that a Girl's duty is to bear the children and cook for the family. Additionally, I feel that our traditions and beliefs too are responsible for this attitude in the people. " Na Putra Gatir Nasti ", Without a male child, it is not possible to stop the cycle of Birth and death.. As you said, this belief is firmly rooted in our society. It is essential to change the attitude prevailing in the Society. It certainly takes time to see a change in our Society.    
9 years ago
anil wrote: usha manohar wrote: I wish we had a rule here which stops members from repeating the same thing twice or more times in every page.. @ anil, most colleges are co ed now , even in villages because the number of schools are fewer and they need to cater to all the children in the vicinity they cannot afford to have a boys only or girls only schools.. Here in my city it is not true. Here co-education collages are 2 or three but for girls here 5 colleges. It is right that most of schools in rural area are co-ed. government have not source for separate school for boys and girls in rural area.  Rural people still believe in gender discrimination and are still not open-minded where girls are concerned, and believe that boys are superior to girls. That is why girls and boys are not allowed to mingle freely and even they are allowed to, it changes the moment girls reach puberty when she is not allowed to play, allowed to talk to boys etc. It will still take some more time to change all that.  
9 years ago
In my own city two schools and junior colleges run by the church were for boys only. But recently they have started admitting girls as well, so they too realise the importance of CO education. However, the girls only schools and colleges run by Christian organization still remsins the same..
9 years ago
suni51 wrote: usha manohar wrote: suni51 wrote: Admin is fine, his building caught fire in Riyadh where he is onsite for time being but all is well.    So as of now   the articles already edited by moderators will remain on hold until the admin gets back to the site..   Do you think he has to be in his website's office to publish them?    Ha ha ha.. you know exactly what I mean.    
9 years ago
There are special vacation courts here too that function on week days but with limited capacity and more often than not, you find that either the judge is late or not there or one of the office bearers who manages the files is absent ..
9 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic Too fat for auto .
rambabu wrote: anil wrote: rambabu wrote: anil wrote: rambabu wrote: Asmi Shah who was insulted by the Auto driver, doesn't have any right to pass snide comments on Asmi's fatness. Autos can refuse to fat people on any other reasons like hiking the price or any other reason. But cannot ridicule or heckle the passenger's body condition. Auto driver have not right to hike fare. He also can not refuse but he can say that if passange can ride in auto than he have no problem.  Yes. Saying , that the Passenger  cannot avail the services, as he's not going in the route asked by the passenger. This would have been OK instead of insulting the passenger. Yes no one have right to comment and insult for the body shape or any other physical disability. When some one comments about these we are disappointed and helplessness. It is harshment. Anil, Asmi Shah, has lodged a police complaint on the Auto driver's rude behaviour with her. The police took up the case and the investigation is going on now. It's only after the completion of the investigation it will be known whether Asmi has fabricated the story to implicate the Auto Driver or not.  We must know, Auto driver too has rights.          
9 years ago
Knowing them, they will niw come up with some bizarre logic trying to justify their criminal act and try damage control. But by now I guess everyone can see through their tactics..
9 years ago
9 years ago
9 years ago
9 years ago
9 years ago
rambabu liked a reply to the topic Too fat for auto .
9 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic Too fat for auto .
anil wrote: rambabu wrote: anil wrote: rambabu wrote: Asmi Shah who was insulted by the Auto driver, doesn't have any right to pass snide comments on Asmi's fatness. Autos can refuse to fat people on any other reasons like hiking the price or any other reason. But cannot ridicule or heckle the passenger's body condition. Auto driver have not right to hike fare. He also can not refuse but he can say that if passange can ride in auto than he have no problem.  Yes. Saying , that the Passenger  cannot avail the services, as he's not going in the route asked by the passenger. This would have been OK instead of insulting the passenger. Yes no one have right to comment and insult for the body shape or any other physical disability. When some one comments about these we are disappointed and helplessness. It is harshment. Anil, Asmi Shah, has lodged a police complaint on the Auto driver's rude behaviour with her. The police took up the case and the investigation is going on now. It's only after the completion of the investigation whether Asmi has fabricated or not to implicate the Auto driver. We must know, Auto driver too has a right.        
9 years ago