OpenMeans Forum
Welcome, Guest
Recent activity
rambabu replied to the topic The (in)efficiency of our high courts...
anil wrote:
usha manohar wrote:
I am told that there is a time limit for cases in high courts , which is 18 months. But this rule is hardly followed by the large majority of the people involved. It is not just the judges or advocates but people involved themselves who often delay the cases. This added with the court holidays and study tour of the lawyers and judges makes the matter worse !
I am listening first time about the time limit. It is right that peoples also don't want that case is decided. Any person, specialy crimenal case, get any decision against him in lower court and he/she submitte appeal in upper court, always wants that case never decided.
Dragging the case for years on will be beneficial to some people. In this respect, Lawyers are also responsible. In a Land grabbing case of a Landlord relation of mine, I heard my friend asking the Lawyer to manipulate and twist the matters in such a manner that the case runs for years and years.In this process, the Key witnesses died and ultimately, , my friend succeeded in grabbing the land. Now on this land, my friend built a multi million flats in vizag.
9 years ago
Bajirao replied to the topic Criteria for promotions - merit or seniority ?.
usha manohar wrote:In India we have unemployment as well as under employment because of lack of job opportunities. However, some retired senior officials known to me have landed better paying jobs after their retirement. It is probably due too the fact that they have a lot to contribute. There is one more avenue for retired professors and lecturers , which I find quite ridiculous. Some private colleges wanting to cut down on staff expenditure , just to keep to the standard student/teacher ratio enroll some retired and well known professors as honorary lecturers. They are paid a smaller sum compared to what a regular professor gets and get to do nothing except go for invigilation and guest lectures once or twice a month. Everyone is happy in this situation but it also shows how our education system works..
Agree, honorary lectures have become very common in today's educational system.
It's win win situation for both the side, retired people can make some money only for tutoring twice or thrice a month and schools and colleges can save money on full time teacher or professor.
Here only one who suffers are students, they don't know whom to contact in case if they have any query with respect to particular topic.
9 years ago
took the quiz Quiz on Satellite Communication.
This quiz is about satellite communication, it deals with the basic information about satellites.
9 years ago
passed the quiz Quiz on Satellite Communication.
This quiz is about satellite communication, it deals with the basic information about satellites.
9 years ago
anil answered the question Remembering Jaya Bhaduri Bachchan.
Most films of Jaya Bhaduri are very simple and I like them. Some more films of Jaya
Naya Din Nayi Raat, Bawacrhi, Noker, Piya Ka Ghar
9 years ago
anil liked the topic Is the Congress party the modern day successor of the Gaddar e Hind Mir Jafar?.
The Congress fought the independence movement under Gandhi, but after death of Gandhi it lost its moorings and new bunch of leaders like Rahul and his coterie forgot about nation. Aided and abetted by the Italian lady Sonia this new bunch fosted puppets like Manmohan Singh on Indian masses and started systematic looting of state exchequer. To continue in power this group created vote banks of Muslims and started inventing false cases agaonst leaders who were honest as they feared them. We all know that before Battle of Plessey the Mir Jafar foremost commander of Siraj ud dowlah defected to Robert Clive
MirJafar just wanted to be made nawab, country be damned. He betrayed India
Similarly the Congress led by Sonia and Rahul like Mir Jafar can betray India by forgery and lies and false cases just to remain in power. They all deserve the deepest place in hell like Mir Jafar who I am sure is there.
9 years ago
anil replied to the topic Too fat for auto .
usha manohar wrote:
anil wrote:
rambabu wrote:
anil wrote:
rambabu wrote:
Asmi Shah who was insulted by the Auto driver, doesn't have any right to pass snide comments on Asmi's fatness. Autos can refuse to fat people on any other reasons like hiking the price or any other reason. But cannot ridicule or heckle the passenger's body condition.
Auto driver have not right to hike fare. He also can not refuse but he can say that if passange can ride in auto than he have no problem.
Yes. Saying , that the Passenger cannot avail the services, as he's not going in the route asked by the passenger. This would have been OK instead of insulting the passenger.
Yes no one have right to comment and insult for the body shape or any other physical disability. When some one comments about these we are disappointed and helplessness. It is harshment.
It is cruel to make fun of people because they are fat, deformed ,dark or ugly ! But this happens all the time, is glorified in our films where audience laugh when the director makes fun of fat people, deformed people or insults people who are not good looking or at times even those who are old...This attitude comes from the society and the auto driver is part of that society.The girl of course has revolted rather than put up with it, which is good !
Yes I am agree with you, I was also laugh many time of fat charcter of movies, Tuntun is famous one. But aim of director and actor are that viewers laugh on them. It is not fare in real life. But time is changed. How many were laugh on heroin of Dum Laga Ke Hai Sa. I like this film and actress as well.
9 years ago
anil replied to the topic Criteria for promotions - merit or seniority ?.
Kalyani Nandurkar wrote:
That is so ad, but this kind of thing happens in almost organisations. Truth is, nowadays, seniority and experience hardly counts for much. The younger people might be good workers and may have talent and knowledge of latest technology required than the senior person may have. But the fact still remains that the senior person has put in more years of his life to the job and has the benefit of better experience and judgement that will come handy while leading others, so ignoring such a person and promoting others is simply not fair.
I am agreed with you that senior person must not be ignored. But most of private organization have not rule and regulation for promotion. it is depends on will of management and owner. In 1993 I joined cement factory as accountant. There one accountant is already working, he is elder in age than me but because of higher education I was his senior.
9 years ago
anil replied to the topic The (in)efficiency of our high courts...
usha manohar wrote:
I am told that there is a time limit for cases in high courts , which is 18 months. But this rule is hardly followed by the large majority of the people involved. It is not just the judges or advocates but people involved themselves who often delay the cases. This added with the court holidays and study tour of the lawyers and judges makes the matter worse !
I am listening first time about the time limit. It is right that peoples also don't want that case is decided. Any person, specialy crimenal case, get any decision against him in lower court and he/she submitte appeal in upper court, always wants that case never decided.
9 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic The (in)efficiency of our high courts...
Judicial Backlog , shortage of staff, heavy dependence on paper work, Corruption in the Judiciary itself are some factors, likely to stay, I don't know how long. But, a little effort on part of our Government can go a long way in rectifying though not all, some of the problems faced by our judiciary today
9 years ago
usha manohar replied to the topic The (in)efficiency of our high courts...
I am not saying courts are efficient, they are not...But they are certainly better functioning now than before. May be they have become more corrupt, that I wouldn't know. But the efficiency has increased inspite of shortage of staff. there is a severe shortage of judges and the recent case that we have is ready for judgment since 6 months. But the judge has no time to sit and go through the entire paper work before giving his verdict, which runs to few hundred pages , so he is putting it off.In such a situation one can only blame the government for not providing enough staff, this is true of all states.. There are far too many cases being filed and not enough staff.
9 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic The (in)efficiency of our high courts...
anil wrote:
usha manohar wrote:
I am told that there is a time limit for cases in high courts , which is 18 months. But this rule is hardly followed by the large majority of the people involved. It is not just the judges or advocates but people involved themselves who often delay the cases. This added with the court holidays and study tour of the lawyers and judges makes the matter worse !
I am listening first time about the time limit. It is right that peoples also don't want that case is decided. Any person, specialy crimenal case, get any decision against him in lower court and he/she submitte appeal in upper court, always wants that case never decided.
Dragging the case for years on will be beneficial to some people. In this respect, Lawyers are also responsible. In a Land grabbing case of a Landlord relation of mine, I heard my friend asking the Lawyer to manipulate and twist the matters in such a manner that the case runs for years and years.In this process, the Key witnesses died and ultimately, , my friend succeeded in grabbing the land. Now on this land, my friend built a multi million flats in vizag.
9 years ago
Bajirao replied to the topic Criteria for promotions - merit or seniority ?.
usha manohar wrote:In India we have unemployment as well as under employment because of lack of job opportunities. However, some retired senior officials known to me have landed better paying jobs after their retirement. It is probably due too the fact that they have a lot to contribute. There is one more avenue for retired professors and lecturers , which I find quite ridiculous. Some private colleges wanting to cut down on staff expenditure , just to keep to the standard student/teacher ratio enroll some retired and well known professors as honorary lecturers. They are paid a smaller sum compared to what a regular professor gets and get to do nothing except go for invigilation and guest lectures once or twice a month. Everyone is happy in this situation but it also shows how our education system works..
Agree, honorary lectures have become very common in today's educational system.
It's win win situation for both the side, retired people can make some money only for tutoring twice or thrice a month and schools and colleges can save money on full time teacher or professor.
Here only one who suffers are students, they don't know whom to contact in case if they have any query with respect to particular topic.
9 years ago
took the quiz Quiz on Satellite Communication.
This quiz is about satellite communication, it deals with the basic information about satellites.
9 years ago
passed the quiz Quiz on Satellite Communication.
This quiz is about satellite communication, it deals with the basic information about satellites.
9 years ago
anil answered the question Remembering Jaya Bhaduri Bachchan.
Most films of Jaya Bhaduri are very simple and I like them. Some more films of Jaya
Naya Din Nayi Raat, Bawacrhi, Noker, Piya Ka Ghar
9 years ago
anil liked the topic Is the Congress party the modern day successor of the Gaddar e Hind Mir Jafar?.
The Congress fought the independence movement under Gandhi, but after death of Gandhi it lost its moorings and new bunch of leaders like Rahul and his coterie forgot about nation. Aided and abetted by the Italian lady Sonia this new bunch fosted puppets like Manmohan Singh on Indian masses and started systematic looting of state exchequer. To continue in power this group created vote banks of Muslims and started inventing false cases agaonst leaders who were honest as they feared them. We all know that before Battle of Plessey the Mir Jafar foremost commander of Siraj ud dowlah defected to Robert Clive
MirJafar just wanted to be made nawab, country be damned. He betrayed India
Similarly the Congress led by Sonia and Rahul like Mir Jafar can betray India by forgery and lies and false cases just to remain in power. They all deserve the deepest place in hell like Mir Jafar who I am sure is there.
9 years ago
anil replied to the topic Too fat for auto .
usha manohar wrote:
anil wrote:
rambabu wrote:
anil wrote:
rambabu wrote:
Asmi Shah who was insulted by the Auto driver, doesn't have any right to pass snide comments on Asmi's fatness. Autos can refuse to fat people on any other reasons like hiking the price or any other reason. But cannot ridicule or heckle the passenger's body condition.
Auto driver have not right to hike fare. He also can not refuse but he can say that if passange can ride in auto than he have no problem.
Yes. Saying , that the Passenger cannot avail the services, as he's not going in the route asked by the passenger. This would have been OK instead of insulting the passenger.
Yes no one have right to comment and insult for the body shape or any other physical disability. When some one comments about these we are disappointed and helplessness. It is harshment.
It is cruel to make fun of people because they are fat, deformed ,dark or ugly ! But this happens all the time, is glorified in our films where audience laugh when the director makes fun of fat people, deformed people or insults people who are not good looking or at times even those who are old...This attitude comes from the society and the auto driver is part of that society.The girl of course has revolted rather than put up with it, which is good !
Yes I am agree with you, I was also laugh many time of fat charcter of movies, Tuntun is famous one. But aim of director and actor are that viewers laugh on them. It is not fare in real life. But time is changed. How many were laugh on heroin of Dum Laga Ke Hai Sa. I like this film and actress as well.
9 years ago
anil replied to the topic Criteria for promotions - merit or seniority ?.
Kalyani Nandurkar wrote:
That is so ad, but this kind of thing happens in almost organisations. Truth is, nowadays, seniority and experience hardly counts for much. The younger people might be good workers and may have talent and knowledge of latest technology required than the senior person may have. But the fact still remains that the senior person has put in more years of his life to the job and has the benefit of better experience and judgement that will come handy while leading others, so ignoring such a person and promoting others is simply not fair.
I am agreed with you that senior person must not be ignored. But most of private organization have not rule and regulation for promotion. it is depends on will of management and owner. In 1993 I joined cement factory as accountant. There one accountant is already working, he is elder in age than me but because of higher education I was his senior.
9 years ago
anil replied to the topic The (in)efficiency of our high courts...
usha manohar wrote:
I am told that there is a time limit for cases in high courts , which is 18 months. But this rule is hardly followed by the large majority of the people involved. It is not just the judges or advocates but people involved themselves who often delay the cases. This added with the court holidays and study tour of the lawyers and judges makes the matter worse !
I am listening first time about the time limit. It is right that peoples also don't want that case is decided. Any person, specialy crimenal case, get any decision against him in lower court and he/she submitte appeal in upper court, always wants that case never decided.
9 years ago
rambabu replied to the topic The (in)efficiency of our high courts...
Judicial Backlog , shortage of staff, heavy dependence on paper work, Corruption in the Judiciary itself are some factors, likely to stay, I don't know how long. But, a little effort on part of our Government can go a long way in rectifying though not all, some of the problems faced by our judiciary today
9 years ago
usha manohar replied to the topic The (in)efficiency of our high courts...
I am not saying courts are efficient, they are not...But they are certainly better functioning now than before. May be they have become more corrupt, that I wouldn't know. But the efficiency has increased inspite of shortage of staff. there is a severe shortage of judges and the recent case that we have is ready for judgment since 6 months. But the judge has no time to sit and go through the entire paper work before giving his verdict, which runs to few hundred pages , so he is putting it off.In such a situation one can only blame the government for not providing enough staff, this is true of all states.. There are far too many cases being filed and not enough staff.
9 years ago